Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

226 DAWN M. HAZLEWOOD v. SYLVAN POECKH -- rank: 527

... that a certification is a sworn statement. He states that N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 gives him the right to "equal custody" meaning "equality of ...

docket:	a6489-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	89630

227 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. L.M. -- rank: 527

... find no reason to disturb the trial court's findings. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b) states: Notwithstanding any provision of law to the ...

docket:	a3947-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35922

228 CATHLEEN M. MYERS v. ROY MYERS, II -- rank: 525

... case law, the court noted that it is guided by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and "the court shall consider but not be limited to ... factors in determining the best interests of the child. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). A court is required to place on the record ... the factors it considers consequential in reaching its custody decision. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f); Monte v. Monte , 212 N.J. Super. 557 , 565 ... each other." Ibid. In reviewing the numerous factors embodied in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), the judge expressed concern over the lack of cooperation ...

docket:	a2201-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25735

229 M.H.-S. v. S.S. -- rank: 522

... Custody arrangements focus on the best interests of the child. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), (d). See also R.K., 437 N.J. Super ...

docket:	a4629-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20202

230 BENJAMIN B. TAYLOR v. MARIA E. JONES -- rank: 522

... than that of [plaintiff]. Next, applying the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), the judge ordered the parties to share legal and ...

docket:	a3909-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26085

231 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2289-21.opn.html -- rank: 522

... order. The court further analyzed the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and awarded plaintiff full custody of Jane and Cindy ... POINT IV: THE TRIAL COURT IMPROPERLY PARSED THE FACTORS OF N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. POINT V: THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING DEFENDANT VIOLATED ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25568

232 RAMON A. BLANCAS v. TRACY BLANCAS -- rank: 520

... pursue visitation with his daughter. Applying various pertinent factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge reasonably concluded that it was in the daughter ...

docket:	a1321-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43390

233 C.S v. J.L-S. -- rank: 520

... He elaborated on this issue during his testimony addressing the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors as follows: [Plaintiff's Counsel:] Factor number five ... behavior can only be an act. The judge assessed each N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factor and found they preponderated in plaintiff's favor ... of thirteen statutory factors the judge had to consider under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The record supported the judge's decision to not ...

docket:	a1712-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-26
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	51200

234 J.K. v. R.B. -- rank: 517

... plenary hearing. The trial court shall address the factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), and any other relevant factor in determining whether a ...

docket:	a1434-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28406

235 DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. G.M., M.M. -- rank: 517

... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)"); and see 358 N.J. Super. 179 , 203 (App ... 2004), certif. denied , 182 N.J. 426 (2005); but see N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)(providing that one factor for the court's consideration ...

docket:	A2173-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-23
status:	published
citation:	398 N.J.Super. 21
Document Size:	92565

236 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a1342-12.opn.html -- rank: 515

... state. Judge DeLorenzo thoroughly reviewed the fourteen factors outlined in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). 7 The judge acknowledged, when considering factor eleven, "the ... maintained as it was in the children's best interests. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). As that schedule did not involve a fifty-fifty ... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) (emphasis added).] This archive is a service of Rutgers ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25081

237 HEIDI JUDD CARD v. DAVID MICHAEL CARD -- rank: 515

... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)." Ibid. "Although a joint legal custodial relationship among parents ...

docket:	a5594-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-12-11
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	58155

238 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. E.G. & A.R. -- rank: 515

... approximately two months. Third, there is the significant hurdle of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b), which prohibits a person convicted of endangering the ...

docket:	a3235-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27848

239 NEW JERSEY DIVIISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. E.G. -- rank: 515

... approximately two months. Third, there is the significant hurdle of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(b), which prohibits a person convicted of endangering the ...

docket:	a3236-13
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2015-02-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27724

240 MARCIE SANDERS v. SCOTT SANDERS -- rank: 515

... Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 N.J. 309, 321 (2017) (quoting N.J.S.A. 9:2-4). However, in this case, the judge clearly stated that the ... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).' Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J. Super. 102, 105 ...

docket:	a3497-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-12-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20106