Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

241 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the LEE PHILLIPS v. KIMBERLY YORK -- rank: 515

... court shall consider each of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. See V.C. v. M.J.B., 163 N.J ... interests standard giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4'), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 926, 9 A-1149-16T1 ...

docket:	a1149-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30937

242 JULIA K. WARD v. BRIAN T. WARD -- rank: 515

... state. Judge DeLorenzo thoroughly reviewed the fourteen factors outlined in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). 7 The judge acknowledged, when considering factor eleven, "the ... maintained as it was in the children's best interests. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). As that schedule did not involve a fifty-fifty ... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) (emphasis added).] This archive is a service of Rutgers ...

docket:	a1342-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-05
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	25245

243 K.K. v. W.L. -- rank: 515

... court "must specifically reference the statutory criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)." Luedtke v. Shobert , 342 N.J. Super. 202 , 218 ...

docket:	a2410-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20455

244 E.D. v. D.C. -- rank: 515

... Teresa's best interests, upon application of the factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. As for grandparent visitation, the court likewise found that Eunice ...

docket:	a3378-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-02-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59608

245 TIMOTHY CHEN v. MEI-IN CHEN -- rank: 510

... issue of K.'s best interests, the judge relied on N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and the factors enumerated therein, particularly: (1) (the parents' ability ... foster the best interests of the child."). On this score, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 details the fourteen factors a court must consider in the ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] The statute further mandates that a court awarding joint ... decisions regarding the child's health, education and general welfare." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 itself that if an act of domestic violence is a ...

docket:	a1851-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-10-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50384

246 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0604-19.opn.html -- rank: 510

... the court will consider all relevant factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), supplemented by other factors as appropriate.'). A-0604-19T4 ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	18079

247 MICHELE VIDAL v. ANTHONY GELAK -- rank: 508

... responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this policy." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Both parties here have a fundamental right to "the custody ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)] See V.C. , supra , 163 N.J. at 227 ...

docket:	a1553-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35624

248 V.U. v. L.U. -- rank: 505

... they could lose custody rights, visitation rights, and vacation time. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. In determining custody issues, "the sole benchmark is the best ...

docket:	a5395-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-22
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	52082

249 F.S v. R.A.L -- rank: 505

... parents' conduct has a substantial adverse effect on the child. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c).] 7 A-5315-15T1 108, 118 (App. Div. 2009 ...

docket:	a5315-15
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-30
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20636

250 ENGY ABDELKADER v. AHMED ISLAME HOSNY -- rank: 503

... out of state by weighing the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and other relevant considerations, and determining whether the relocation is ... determine what custodial arrangement now serves Alec's best interests. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The appeal is dismissed; the matter is remanded to the ...

docket:	a1666-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-07-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	16951

251 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. N.S and K.S -- rank: 501

... a best interests analysis, applying the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 in order to determine whether the children should remain in ... dispositional hearing is the best interests of the child under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, unless the Title Thirty action involves an out-of-home ...

docket:	a3702-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-10-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60735

252 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5740-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 501

... schedule. The judge carefully considered the statutory factors contained in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Focusing on the age of the child, the judge ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34293

253 KEITH REPACK v. SHANNON KEAVY June 9 2015 -- rank: 501

... decision, the court must consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Hand , supra , 391 N.J. Super. at 105. Under ...

docket:	a5537-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-06-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	31036

254 GARY S. BENEDUCCI v. MICHELE BENEDUCCI -- rank: 501

... findings of fact as to all statutory custody factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), and the court erred in concluding plaintiff demonstrated changed ...

docket:	a3969-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20275

255 JARRED CIPRIANI v. ASHLEY FONTANA -- rank: 501

... schedule. The judge carefully considered the statutory factors contained in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Focusing on the age of the child, the judge ...

docket:	a3872-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34707