Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

271 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. T.A.C. -- rank: 489

... reflected in an order, after the judge ruled, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4.1(a), defendant – in light of his conviction for ...

docket:	a4390-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36194

272 D.Q. VS. F.Q. -- rank: 489

... failed to analyze the child custody statutory factors pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and make the requisite factual findings. A-0950-22 ... analysis of the child custody statutory factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The record reflects plaintiff repeatedly requested sole custody and ...

docket:	a0950-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20640

273 RUSSELL D. COOMBS, JR v. MICHELLE M. COOMBS -- rank: 489

... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)] A prior custody order 'whether reached by consent or ...

docket:	a0479-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-05-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49701

274 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/trial/aw-v-td.opn.html -- rank: 486

... dying mother and primary caretaker. New Jersey’s custody statute, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, expressly directs courts to consider the needs of the children ... transfer of custody, if and when medically necessary. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the parties as joint legal custodians have an ongoing obligation ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	24889

275 DAVID MAURIELLO v. DIANE MAURIELLO -- rank: 486

... its decision, the court specifically addressed factors set forth under N.J.S.A . 9:2-4(c) that it found relevant to the resolution of the ... THE COURT FAILED TO CONSIDER MOST OF THE FACTORS IN N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 REQUIRED BEFORE CUSTODY IS CHANGED. THE STATUTE STATES THAT THE ... citing Fantony v. Fantony , 21 N.J. 525 , 536 (1956)). N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 it deemed relevant to the issues before it. Both parties ...

docket:	A0587-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-02-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49344

276 A.K.L. v. M.S.L. -- rank: 484

... consideration of each applicable factor concerning child custody, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and we find no basis to disturb her conclusions. See ...

docket:	a1663-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21305

277 M.J.G. v. M.G. -- rank: 484

... best interests of the child." Ibid. The statutory scheme of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) specifically addresses some, but not all, of the factors ... custody arrangement that is in the minor's best interests. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). In deciding the issue, the court is required to ... Judge DeBello also considered each factor under the custody statute, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). With respect to the factor addressing the preference of ...

docket:	a2582-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23793

278 M.J.A. v. M.S. -- rank: 484

... eighteen years old is a strong factor when considering custody. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). As husband has not consented to this arrangement, we ...

docket:	a2897-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32866

279 T.M. v. A.S. -- rank: 484

... unit, and the child’s physical, emotional, and mental needs. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. See also Todd v. Sheridan , 268 N.J. Super. 387 ...

docket:	tm-v-as
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:	2015-05-04
status:
citation:
Document Size:	84435

280 M.J.A. v. M.S. -- rank: 484

... eighteen years old is a strong factor when considering custody. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). As husband has not consented to this arrangement, we ...

docket:	a3148-12xx
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-03-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32874

281 A.K.L. v. M.S.L. -- rank: 484

... consideration of each applicable factor concerning child custody, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, and we find no basis to disturb her conclusions. See ...

docket:	a4120-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20879

282 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5257-18.opn.html -- rank: 481

... modification in light of the best interests standard articulated under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Here, given the limited scope of the parties' consent order ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19756

283 C.T. v. M.L. -- rank: 481

... responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this policy." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Both parents have a fundamental right to "the custody, care ... 479 (Ch. Div. 1997)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, a judge determining custody shall consider the following factors: the ... controlling "no matter what the parties have agreed to." See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(d), which provides that a "court shall order any custody ...

docket:	a3048-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26684

284 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES v. T.M.L. -- rank: 481

... changes custody arrangements, without a "best interests" hearing. Id. ; see N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (setting forth factors the court must consider in making child ... H. , 389 N.J. Super. 576 , 608 (App. Div. 2007); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; N.J.A.C. 10:122D-1.1; N.J ...

docket:	a1415-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-11-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40615

285 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4699-18.opn.html -- rank: 481

... parents have an equal right to custody of their child. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. To modify a custody order, a party must first make ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	21651