Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

301 A.J.M.D.P. v. M.T.R.C. -- rank: 458

... 5.  Thus, after reviewing all the facts and factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), the court should consider whether it is in Amanda ...

docket:	a2494-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26204

302 TRACEY ANNE ZUCCARO v. BRUCE D. ZUCCARO -- rank: 455

... by the other parent; . . . [and] the fitness of the parents . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.] The parties agreed on joint legal custody in 2004. When ...

docket:	a2403-09
court:	superior court trial
decided:	2011-02-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17780

303 SHARI L. POLLAK v. DAVID KALEN -- rank: 455

... and other expenses.2 He further contends that contrary to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, plaintiff failed to properly consult him about child care expenses ...

docket:	a0911-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-01-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10817

304 NOEL EUSTAQUIO v. BIYUN ZONG -- rank: 455

... rights for agreed decision-making, was reasonable and appropriate. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 ("[I]t is the public policy of this State to ...

docket:	a2244-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21173

305 MISTY ELGERSMA v. COLTON C. CUNNINGHAM -- rank: 455

... For the first time, the court referenced the criteria under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) to consider when ruling on a custody application. After ... the notice of appeal, properly considered the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The judge also found Cunningham to be credible. We ... relocation decision, the court must consider the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and the guidance enunciated under Bisbing v. Bisbing, 230 ...

docket:	a2032-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-09-29
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17447

306 M.H.S. v. L.G.S. -- rank: 453

... prove the best interests of the child in accordance with N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Our standard of review, therefore, is broader than if ...

docket:	a5816-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-09-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35831

307 L.J.L....v. L.G. -- rank: 453

... The Court Must Consider the Statutory Factors Set Forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 in Making a Custody Award. V. The Court Has an ...

docket:	a4526-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37510

308 NORMAN SCHLEIFFER v. LOIS SCHLEIFFER -- rank: 453

... and capacity to reason as to form an intelligent decision." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (c). In doing so, the court should "'conduct a private ... that the judge failed to consider the appropriate statutory factors. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The judge noted, in part: [B]oth parties [were] in ...

docket:	a1935-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34180

309 D.C. v. V.C -- rank: 453

... is the best interests of the child. See, e.g., N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(a) to (c); Pascale v. Pascale, 140 N.J. 583 ...

docket:	a2362-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-01-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15973

310 D. W v. P. W -- rank: 453

... Meticulously applying each of the fourteen custody factors enumerated at N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge concluded that the overall best interests of the ... v. Sacharow , 177 N.J. 62 , 80 (2003); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. This "best interests of the child" standard is, at its ... N.J. Super. 63 , 71 (App. Div. 1995); see also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (recognizing sibling relationships as a custody factor). The son still ...

docket:	a6227-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-10
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	57024

311 S. E. F v. K.D.L -- rank: 453

... interests standard[,] giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2- - 4[(c)].' Id. at 227-28, 230. To establish the existence ...

docket:	a2824-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-06-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20053

312 JENNA SCOTT v. GEOFFREY SCOTT -- rank: 448

... the best interests of the child factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The court also noted that the children have all ... the trial court undertook an analysis of each of the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) best interests factors, which controlled here. For these reasons ... child's medical wellbeing, including 'the needs of the child . . . .' N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The trial court neither abused its discretion nor erred ...

docket:	a0506-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-04-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16541

313 ROBERT GOLDMAN v. GAIL MAUTNER -- rank: 441

... for joint custody and the factors to be considered under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the judge awarded joint legal and physical custody of both ... to custody and parenting time. He considered each factor under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and applied those factors in light of his factual findings ...

docket:	a4085-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-12-18
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	89521

314 MICHAEL PETRONGOLO v. MELINA ALVES -- rank: 441

... in the best interest of the child, the court applies N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c): In making an award of custody, the court shall ... record indicates that Judge Tomasello painstakingly analyzed each factor of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), considering defendant's testimony and the other evidence submitted ...

docket:	a1095-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-11-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13892

315 CRAIG P. STATT v. KAREN KNOX-STATT -- rank: 438

... and maintaining a close relationship with both of his parents. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; McCown v. McCown , 277 N.J. Super. 213 , 218 (App ...

docket:	a3102-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12552