Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 9:2-4")   316 to 330 of 407 results. Run time: 0.844 seconds | Search time: 0.837 seconds    
 Page:1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 Previous 15 Next 15
316 F.A v. C.L.M -- rank: 436
... Points program. A-2968-18T1 8 The judge analyzed the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) factors, concluded the majority of the factors weighed in ...
docket: a2968-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-05-06
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27441
317 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.L. -- rank: 436
... this subject "convincing." Judge Stein also considered the factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 for a determination of the child's best interests. The ...
docket: a0159-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21789
318 G.T v. Y.A -- rank: 436
... are qualified, however, by the multiple factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, which require courts to evaluate a child's best interests ...
docket: a1613-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-11-16
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20831
319 DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.E. -- rank: 434
... best interest, giving weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. The judge concluded that appellants did not meet the standard ...
docket: a4535-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-10-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17993
320 KARIN VALENTINE v. JOHN J. VALENTINE -- rank: 434
... and maintaining a close relationship with both of his parents. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; McCown v. McCown , 277 N.J. Super. 213 , 218 (App ...
docket: a2197-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-12-08
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35561
321 YVETTE JOHNSON v. LEONARD MACK -- rank: 434
... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)." Hand v. Hand , 391 N.J. Super. 102 , 105 ... arrangement that is "in the best interests of the child." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). The same statute requires a judge to consider and ... justify any custody arrangement not agreed to by both parents." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f). Unfortunately, that did not happen here. Instead of making ...
docket: a4669-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-03-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17006
322 M.C. v. J.U. -- rank: 434
... S. Kessler entered an order in February 2008, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1, suspending defendant's visitation with his sons, as well ... 378 (1995)). Defendant's request for visitation is governed by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(a). That statute provides: Notwithstanding any provision of law ... nor does it affect the person's child support obligation. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1(c). This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...
docket: a3952-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-05-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17291
323 MEGAN D. GROVER v. MARVIN TERLAJE -- rank: 434
... quoting Beck , supra , 86 N.J. at 487). See also N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (emphasis added).] As the Supreme Court has said in Beck ...
docket: a6543-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-08-04
status: published
citation: 379 N.J. Super. 400
Document Size: 46529
324 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2480-17.opn.html -- rank: 434
... analysis that gives weight to the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). V.C. v. M.J.B., 163 N.J ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 25162
325 JANICE SKINNER v. BRUCE COLE -- rank: 431
... disclosed and, after briefly addressing some of the factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c), ordered that Noah be transferred to his father's ...
docket: a0323-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-01-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23894
326 AARON S. REED v. SHIRLEY Y. PETTIFORD -- rank: 431
... comprehensive opinion from the bench applying the factors enumerated in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. After reviewing the evidence in the record, the judge concluded ...
docket: a6108-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-03-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37437
327 Paul Emma v. Jessica Evans -- rank: 431
... Ibid. (citing L. 1990, c. 26, ยง 2 (codified at N.J.S.A. 9:2-4)). In Gubernat , we concluded that the appropriate standard governing naming ...
docket: A-112-11
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2013-08-12
status:
citation: 215 N.J. 197 71 A.3d 862
Document Size: 96454
328 CHERI CAIN v. JEFFREY CAIN -- rank: 426
... until such time as the Defendant/Husband establishes, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1b, by clear and convincing evidence that it is in ... his application for visitation with his daughter was governed by N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1a, which provides in pertinent part: Notwithstanding any provision of ... case, the parent bears the burden, in the words of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4.1a, of "showing by clear and convincing evidence" that it ...
docket: a4643-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-01-14
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 38140
329 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. J.J. -- rank: 422
... NECESSARY. POINT III - COURT ABUSED DISCRETION IN OVERLOOKING FACTORS UNDER N.J.S.A. 9:2- 4(C), I.E., DYSFUNCTIONALITY OF HOME, FATHER'S FITNESS, PRIOR ...
docket: a3918-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-03-01
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20430
330 JENNIFER M. STEVENS v. AMIR A. SHAH -- rank: 419
... relevant facts and applied them to the elements listed in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). 1 The court found all factors were equal, except ... determination, the court must address the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) and "must make a record referencing the statutory factors ... employment responsibilities; and the age and number of the children. [ N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)]. 2 Defendant represents that the child is currently attending ...
docket: a1881-12
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-09
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 19328
 Page:1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 Previous 15 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!