Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

331 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5408-15.opn.html -- rank: 419

... him of frequent and continuing contact with both parties.' (citing N.J.S.A. 9:2-4)). We disagree, however, that plaintiff was not entitled to a ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20925

332 DONNELL JOYCE v. TONYELLE THOMPSON -- rank: 419

... erred in failing to consider the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and in concluding plaintiff had not met the threshold burden ...

docket:	a1559-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-08-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15308

333 S.L.R. v. M.J.P. -- rank: 417

... by the trial judge in the "best interests" formulation. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c); Palermo v. Palermo , 164 N.J. Super. 492 (App ... is the preference of the child "when of sufficient age." N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). Because Kali and Emily are both teenagers, the court ...

docket:	a5277-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27189

334 ZORAN MUDRINIC v. TAMARA MUDRINIC -- rank: 414

... N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 as well as N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c)and (f) and erred when he awarded defendant PPR ... 132 (2002) (citing Baures , supra , 167 N.J. at 115); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4; Kinsella v. Kinsella , 150 N.J. 276 , 317 (1997). However ...

docket:	a3639-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25426

335 MARIA SEGARRA v. ROBERTO SOTO -- rank: 412

... assessment that the present best interests of the children, see N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, would not be served by a change in custody, as ...

docket:	a3672-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-01-27
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	87887

336 L.A v. P.Q -- rank: 412

... court expressly reviewed and considered the multi-factor aspects of N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) in light of the evidence presented. For the most ... of the parties; carefully applied the applicable law, in particular, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c); and sensitively determined the facts. These are the hallmarks ...

docket:	a2382-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26042

337 T.M. v. J.M.S. -- rank: 410

... In summary fashion, the judge recited the statutory factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 and determined there had been no change in circumstances to ... the record." No reasons were ever stated on the record. N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(f) states clearly that, in child custody proceedings, "[t]he ...

docket:	a0146-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30733

338 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3583-17.opn.html -- rank: 410

... MSA] ABSENT AN APPLICATION OF THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE MODIFICATION WAS IN THE CHILDREN'S ... 2 IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. POINT IV ALTERNATIVELY, THE [JUDGE] ERRED AS A MATTER OF ... time, the judge did not undertake a sufficient analysis under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. Had there not been an emergent application, we would have ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	9116

339 QUINETTA YOUNG v. WILLIE LEE -- rank: 410

... it as a request for change of custody pursuant to N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. When the matter was fully considered five months after the ...

docket:	a5283-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-01-19
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	54479

340 I.O. v. M.C. -- rank: 407

... defendant's request for a modification of parenting time. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) (requiring that, in making a custody determination, the court ...

docket:	a1022-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25562

341 M.A. v. A.I. -- rank: 407

... indicated that it considered the best interest factors listed in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) for a determination of custody, the court made no ... conducted no further analysis of the best interest factors under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) except for finding that defendant "was on the edge ...

docket:	a4021-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27707

342 ZAHIA H. AWAD v. MARY IBRAHIM -- rank: 407

... by the trial judge in the "best interests" formulation. See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c); Palermo v. Palermo , 164 N.J. Super. 492 (App ... to reason so as to form an intelligent decision." See N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...

docket:	a5601-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24380

343 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5433-17.opn.html -- rank: 405

... determines that would serve the child's best interests. Notably, N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c) authorizes the trial court to order '[a]ny other ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25599

344 T.Z.S v. A.G.W. -- rank: 405

... J. 309 (2017), and after reviewing the factors enumerated at N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the court concluded the move to North Carolina would not ... score is found, as the judge noted, in Bisbing and N.J.S.A. 9:2-4. However, this was not merely a removal case, but was ...

docket:	a0898-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-01-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	13953

345 PAUL BETANCOURT v. ANGELA SPRATLEY -- rank: 405

... of circumstances," appellant was entitled to an analysis of the N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 factors before a determination of residential custody was made. Accordingly ... their homes to assist the court in making such determination); N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 (setting forth the factors for the court to consider in ...

docket:	a0495-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-09
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28572