Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1")   1 to 3 of 3 results. Run time: 0.925 seconds | Search time: 0.919 seconds    
1 SHELLEY PRITCHETT v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 1000
... matter jurisdiction to adjudicate plaintiff's forced retirement claims because N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 (1) grants exclusive jurisdiction of such claims to the Civil ... of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time'). N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 concerns 'reinstatement, back pay,' and provides: Notwithstanding any provision of ... contrary to its purpose'). Here, defendant's suggested construction of N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 contradicts the LAD's purposes. Defendant's interpretation would mean ... the JJC, which are the prerequisites for the application of N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1. Rather, she was 'aggrieved' by her employer's failure to ...
docket: a1956-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-04-24
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 135382
2 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R 1:36-3 CARL E. LARSON v. CITY -- rank: 896
... it lacked jurisdiction over plaintiff's age discrimination claim because N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 requires that forced retirement claims be filed exclusively with the ... lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claim under N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1. Second, the court also concluded plaintiff's common law retaliatory ... We address the court's findings in turn. A. Jurisdiction N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 states: Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, relief ... be limited to his reinstatement with back pay and interest. [ N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 (emphasis added).] The court dismissed plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claim under N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 finding it lacked jurisdiction. The court reasoned that N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 permitted the assertion of a "required to retire" claim ...
docket: a2526-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 60024
3 FRANCINE BUNALSKI v. JOHN BUNALSKI, JR -- rank: 661
... reinstatement as a sergeant on the Irvington police force. See N.J.S.A. 10:5-12.1 (restricting remedy to a person required to retire to reinstatement ...
docket: a6354-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-06-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 62544

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!