Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 CHASE BANK USA, N.A v. JENNIFER STAFFENBERG -- rank: 1000

... district court. In fact, RISA, as it was codified in N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50, specifically provided that a sales finance company could not "charge ... L. 1971, c. 409, § 50. The current version of N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50 continues to provide that: No retail seller, sales finance company ... plus attorney's fees that might otherwise be recoverable. See N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50. In 1991, when the Legislature amended N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a4488-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-11
status:	published
citation:	419 N.J. Super. 386 17 A.3d 239
Document Size:	83732

2 SHERMAN V. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A. -- rank: 780

... charge accounts other than the charges permitted by this act . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50.]     At the time this case was before the Court, the ... violate various provisions of New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50 and -54. The Fraud Act prohibits undisclosed late charges, and ... other things of value in connection with . . . retail charge accounts . . . ." N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50. He claims that "interest" in section 85 refers to periodic ...

docket:	a-102-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-11-28
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 35
Document Size:	152600

3 UNITED CONSUMER FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY v. WILLIAM CARBO -- rank: 780

... any reason." We agree with the trial court's interpretation. N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50 (emphasis added). The charge specified in this contract, which can be charged "for any reason," violates N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50 because it is not authorized by N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50 was violated by "contract[ing] for" the right to assess ... include a check fee prohibited by RISA and thereby violate N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50. Based upon that violation of RISA, the trial court found ...

docket:	a5501-06
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-10-22
status:	Published
citation:	410 N.J. Super. 280 982 A.2d 7
Document Size:	93598

4 Henry Sanchez v. Fitness Factory Edgewater, LLC -- rank: 743

... a fee that is not expressly authorized is a violation. N.J.S.A. 17:16C- 50. Importantly for purposes of this case, RISA provides the following ... N.J.S.A. 17:16C-35, and other fees, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50. Additionally, it includes provisions to make contracts more readily understandable ...

docket:	a-93-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-05-28
status:
citation:
Document Size:	48239

5 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a_92_93_15.opn.html -- rank: 644

... of “clearly established” right under Retail Installment Sales Act, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50); Bosland , supra , 396 N.J. Super. at 278-80 (holding ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	210705

6 Debra Dugan v. TGI Fridays, Inc. -- rank: 644

... of “clearly established” right under Retail Installment Sales Act, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50); Bosland , supra , 396 N.J. Super. at 278-80 (holding ...

docket:	a-92-15
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2017-10-04
status:
citation:
Document Size:	210799

7 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5381-16.opn.html -- rank: 590

... assuming the statute applies, the fee would be a violation. N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50. Because RISA does not afford buyers with a private right ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	35958

8 HUNTER v. GREENWOOD TRUST COMPANY -- rank: 551

... plaintiff argues that New Jersey's Retail Installment Sales Act, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50, -54 (RISA) (since amended, L. 1995, c. 43) forbids federally ... that New Jersey's Retail Installment Sales Act of 1960, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50, to -54 ("RISA"), forbids federally-insured state banks from charging ...

docket:	a-103-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-11-28
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 97
Document Size:	58541

9 ROBERT MELLET v. AQUASID, LLC -- rank: 490

... fees, or the expense to retake goods authorized by law, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50. Defendant argues RISA does not apply to their membership agreements ...

docket:	a4438-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-16
status:	published
citation:	452 N.J.Super. 23 171 A.3d 207
Document Size:	29427

10 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a4438-15.opn.html -- rank: 487

... fees, or the expense to retake goods authorized by law, N.J.S.A. 17:16C-50. Defendant argues RISA does not apply to their membership agreements ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:	452 N.J.Super. 23 171 A.3d 207
Document Size:	34239