Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 17:22-6.50")   1 to 1 of 1 results. Run time: 0.885 seconds | Search time: 0.878 seconds    
1 TWBC III, INC., a New JerseyCorporation, and 1331 OCEANAVENUE SEA BRIGHT ASSOCIATES,a Partnership,Plaintiffs-Appellants,vs. THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS ATLLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TOPOLICY NO. 894 305481 92,H. JAMES GRIFFITH, PRINCETONRISK MANAGERS, INC. -- rank: 1000
... claim that Princeton failed to comply with its obligation under N.J.S.A. 17:22-6.50. That statute requires that a "surplus lines agent" who has ... Plaintiffs claim, however, that in providing the notice mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:22-6.50, Princeton could not contact the insured's broker, but had ... representative, its broker, Gilmartin & Kierstead. We find no violation of N.J.S.A. 17:22-6.50.     Affirmed. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of ...
docket: a3597-97
court: njappellate
decided: 1999-07-13
status: published
citation: 323 N.J.Super. 60
Document Size: 18800

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!