Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 17:22a-40")   1 to 11 of 11 results. Run time: 0.809 seconds | Search time: 0.803 seconds    
1 MARLENE CARIDE v. PAUL B. KUMAR -- rank: 1000
... the ALJ's determination that 'the Department proved . . . [Kumar] violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (5), (7), (8) and (16) and N.J ... determination that the Department did [not] prove that [Kumar] violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(10) (forging another's name to an application).' Further ... error that indicated that the Department had proved Kumar violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(10) by forging another's name. In all other ... in this State or elsewhere; .... (16) Committing any fraudulent act; .... [N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40] Here, the Commissioner determined that Kumar 'submitted six applications for ... the ALJ's determination that the Department proved violations of N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a): (2) violating any A-2627-21 17 insurance law ... decision as to the violations of the Producer Act, including N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (5), (7), (8), and (16). Kumar's ...
docket: a2627-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-12-29
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49745
2 JUSTIN ZIMMERMAN v. GENEVIEVE STEWARD -- rank: 847
... Co. pursuant to a bail-bond agreement, in violation of N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (8); N.J.A.C. 11:17A-1 ... for the bail bonds of three individuals, in violation of N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (4), (8) and N.J.A.C. 11 ... bail bond of one of those individuals, in violation of N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(2), (4), (8) and N.J.A.C. 11 ... violation of N.J.S.A. 17:22A-29 and N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (8). In count five, the Department alleged ECBB ... Wildwood office as a second branch office, in violation of N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (8) and N.J.A.C. 11:17C ... timely reply to the Department's inquiries, in violation of N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (8) and N.J.A.C. 11: ...
docket: a2371-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-08-09
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23370
3 MARLENE CARIDE v. ANDREW TEPEDINO -- rank: 809
... the charges brought against 1 The Department alleged respondents violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (5), (7), (8), (10), and (16). A-2797 ... ALJ's conclusion that as to count one, respondents violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(2), (5), and (7), N.J.A.C. 11 ... count two and paragraph one of count eight, respondents violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(2), (5) (7), (8), and (16), N.J.A ... the Commissioner adopted the ALJ's conclusion that respondents violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (5) (7), (8), and (16), and N.J ... the Commissioner adopted the ALJ's conclusion that respondents violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (5) (7), (8), and (16), N.J.S ... the Commissioner adopted the ALJ's conclusion that respondents violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (5) (7), (8), and (16), N.J. ...
docket: a2797-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-11-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41734
4 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2289-19.opn.html -- rank: 805
... N.J.S.A. 17:22A-32(a)(2) and N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(16), based on the fraudulent act which precipitated his ... N.J.S.A. 17:22A-32(a)(2) and N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(16), prohibits it. She also rejected Orloff's belated ... denial, suspension or revocation set forth in section 15 of [N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40].' N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40 provides: 'a. The commissioner may place on probation, suspend, revoke ... N.J.S.A. 17:22A-32(a)(2) and N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(16) are the controlling standards. The Commissioner also rejected ... misappropriation of client funds constitutes a disqualifying fraudulent act under N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(16). That being so, N.J.S.A. ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 25666
5 RICHARD J. BADOLATO COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE v. PAUL J. VINCI -- rank: 783
... N.J.A.C. 11:17D-2.5(e), and N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(2) and (8). The Commissioner also adopted Judge Masin ... s power to revoke an insurance producer license comes from N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40, which provides, in relevant part: The commissioner may . . . revoke . . . an ... business in this State or elsewhere . . . . A-0354-17T2 8 [ N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (8).] Additionally, '[n]o person whose license has ... 531 U.S. 926 (2000)). The plain language of both N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a) and N.J.A.C. 11:17D- 2.5 ... violated an insurance law, regulation, or order of the Commissioner. N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2). A person whose insurance producer's license has ... can be suspended or revoked in the instant matter. See N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(2). Thus, unlike the Bureau of Securities in ...
docket: a0354-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-03-01
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22150
6 RICHARD J. BADOLATO v. WEIRAN DOBREK -- rank: 779
... concluded that "Weiran . . . committed a 'fraudulent act' as contemplated by N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(16) by making a false insurance claim." The ALJ ... with Weiran. Similarly, she rejected the argument that Weiran violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(8) because "the language of this particular provision seems ... finding that Weiran did not act intentionally, as contemplated by N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(5), or that an insurance producer making fraudulent statements ... conclusions with certain modifications. First, the Commissioner found Weiran "violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40[(a)](2), (5), (8) and (16)." Second, he determined that ... in this State or elsewhere; . . . . (16) Committing any fraudulent act. [ N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40.] 5 The statute requires: An insurance producer [to] report to ...
docket: a2990-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-07-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41508
7 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0119-19.opn.html -- rank: 754
... C. about the cancellation of the insurance policy (count one), N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(8); failed to refund premium within five days (count two), N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (4), (8) and N.J.A.C. 11 ... license. . . for any one or more' of nineteen enumerated 'causes.' N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(1) to (19). The Commissioner also can impose civil ... the conduct of insurance business in this State or elsewhere. . . . [ N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (4), (8).] A-0119-19T3 6 The Commissioner ... financial irresponsibility' in the course of the producer's business. N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2), (4), (8). There was unrebutted evidence to support ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 20238
8 COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE v. FIRST JERSEY INSURANCE AGENCY -- rank: 686
... therefore, violated N.J.S.A. 17:29B-4(2), N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2) and (7), and N.J.A.C. 11 ...
docket: a5076-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-01-11
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 38391
9 MARLENE CARIDE, COMMISSIONER NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE v. CATARINA YOUNG -- rank: 679
... violated the Producer Act by being convicted of serious crimes. N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(6), (8) and (16). The ALJ then considered what ... modified the ALJ's findings to specify that respondent violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a)(2) ('violating any insurance laws'); N.J.S.A. 17:22A- 40(a)(4) ('improperly withholding, misappropriating or converting any monies or ...
docket: a5419-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-10-25
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32982
10 STEVEN M. GOLDMAN v. JOSE D. URIBE -- rank: 618
... granted the Department's motion, in part, finding appellants violated N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a) as to five counts. In a written opinion, the ... license for any one or more violations of IPLA(2001). N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a). The test for reviewing administrative sanctions is "'whether such ... Commissioner is authorized to issue a penalty for violations of N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40(a). Administrative penalties "must be tested for reasonableness as applied ...
docket: a1285-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-03-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30164
11 IMO Daniel J. Culnen -- rank: 579
... do not provide for a hearing. On the other hand, N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40, empowering the Commissioner to deny or not renew a license ...
docket: A1917-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-03-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 52721

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!