Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Guerline Felix v. Brian V. Richards -- rank: 1000

... 6A-4) or section 19 of L. 1983, c. 362 ([ N.J.S.A.] 17:28-1.3) for any New Jersey resident who is not required to ... 4) or of section 19 of L. 1983, c. 362 ([ N.J.S.A.] 17:28-1.3), whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ...

docket:	a-27-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-02-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	80420

2 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF DELAWARE v. 4M INTERPRISE, INC -- rank: 927

... pedestrian personal injury protection (pedestrian-PIP) benefits in conformity with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 or by precluding them from participating in the New Jersey ... the State caused by the named insured's motor vehicle . . . ." N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 (emphasis added). For the purposes of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, the term "motor vehicle" includes taxis. See N.J.S ... kind." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4; see also N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 (requiring pedestrian-PIP coverage "in accordance with N.J.S ... 1996) (noting that the Legislature required pedestrian-PIP coverage in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 "'to comport with the original intent of the no-fault ... deny that the policy it sold to 4M conforms with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3. It includes an endorsement asserting that ORRG "will pay ...

docket:	a3490-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-06
status:	published
citation:	431 N.J.Super. 514 70 A.3d 757
Document Size:	42904

3 Edward Zabilowicz v. Roslyne Kelsey -- rank: 760

... pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3. In addition to that mandated coverage, the Deemer Statute provides ...

docket:	a-87-08
court:	supreme
decided:	2009-12-17
status:
citation:	200 N.J. 507 984 A.2d 872
Document Size:	25378

4 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Licensed Beverage Insurance Exchange -- rank: 755

... an automobile insurer may seek reimbursement. (pp. 5-12) 3. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 (section 1.3), which requires commercial vehicles to provide PIP ... those tortfeasors who own commercial vehicles, as set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3. That interpretation, the LBIE maintains, becomes manifest when N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 and 108 N.J. 123, 128 (1987); Renz v. Penn ... S.A. 39:6A-9.1 was the enactment of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, which supplements N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 ... the law in question." Id. at 103.     The effect of N.J.S.A 17:28-1.3 is to require insurers of commercial vehicles to provide PIP ...

docket:	a-90-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-07-31
status:
citation:	146 N.J. 1
Document Size:	45567

5 JOHN K. CUPIDO v. WILLIAM PEREZ -- rank: 683

... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3] for any New Jersey resident who is not required to ... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3], whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ...

docket:	a4557-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-27
status:
citation:	415 N.J. Super. 587 2 A.3d 1159
Document Size:	30499

6 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1312-18.opn.html -- rank: 678

... pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3] for any New Jersey resident who is not A-1312 ... to [N.J. Stat. § 39:6A-4] or section [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3] and who is not otherwise eligible for such benefits, whenever ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	29766

7 HAN HUNG LUONG v. FRANK T. GEORGE -- rank: 627

... pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3] for any New Jersey resident who is not required to ... pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3], whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ...

docket:	a0878-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22970

8 RICHARD P. BADUINI et al. v. STEPHINA SERINA -- rank: 622

... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3] whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ...

docket:	A3842-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-03-10
status:	published
citation:	375 N.J. Super. 478 868 A.2d 372
Document Size:	21593

9 MARTIN V. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 616

... same contribution to the UCJF as the in-state carrier. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, and buses must maintain no-fault medical expense benefits for ...

docket:	a-114-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-07-31
status:
citation:	141 N.J. 279
Document Size:	46930

10 JOSE L. CHAVEZ v. THE PROFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 606

... pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3], whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ...

docket:	a5665-06
court:
decided:	2008-08-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42147

11 21st CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION AS STATUTORY ADMINISTRATOR OF UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 598

... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. Instead, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, Blatz's PIP benefits were the responsibility of Translico. Approximately ... March 2006 that all risk retention groups must comply with N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 by providing pedestrian PIP coverage for commercial vehicles in accordance ... responsible for pedestrian-PIP claims under policies issued pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3 by commercial insurers who are members of PLIGA because those ...

docket:	a1773-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17976

12 AIG CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GREGORY R. THOMPSON -- rank: 588

... Business Auto Policy, except for injuries suffered by pedestrians. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3. Harris, however, had procured from AIG a basic automobile insurance ...

docket:	a4358-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-11-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23003

13 ABDUL H. MUHAMMAD v. ELIZABETH YELLOW CAB INC -- rank: 573

... We will pay Pedestrian Personal Injury Protection benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, which states: Every liability insurance policy issued in this State ...

docket:	a4197-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33244

14 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a2923-11.opn.html -- rank: 568

... a taxi. Consequently, Allstate sought reimbursement from ORRG. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3, ORRG's policy of liability insurance on a motor vehicle ... OR ORDERS AND, THEREFORE, IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3. II. THE DECISION OF THE ARBITRATOR SHOULD BE VACATED AS ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	23563

15 COMPREHENSIVE PAIN SOLUTIONS OF NEW JERSEY PC v. OMNI INSURANCE COMPANY c/o GOOD 2 GO AUTO INSURANCE -- rank: 542

... to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4] or of [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.3], whenever the automobile or motor vehicle insured under the policy ...

docket:	a0862-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-03-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27139