Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/squibs16-17.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... for injuries suffered while a pedestrian, are not covered by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, commonly known as the 'Deemer Statute,' which is triggered only ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	151111

2 GUERLINE FELIX v. BRIAN V. RICHARDS -- rank: 933

... brief). PER CURIAM The issue in this appeal is whether N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, the Deemer statute, applies to an automobile insurance policy written ... 3 The reference here is to the second sentence of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 that begins, 'In addition.' 10 A-5093-16T4 In 1998 ... under the policy is used or operated in this State. [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (emphasis added).] In the first sentence, that was added by ... amendment; the reference is not in the second sentence of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. The second sentence only mentions N.J.S.A. 39 ... of P.L. 1972, c. 197 (C. 39:6B-1).' N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Subsection 'a' requires an owner of a motor vehicle registered ... policies without BI coverage are affected by its interpretation of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. If an out-of-state policy has BI coverage ...

docket:	a5093-16
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-01
status:
citation:
Document Size:	35535

3 Guerline Felix v. Brian V. Richards -- rank: 925

... Court. Under New Jersey’s so-called “deemer” statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, out-of-state motor vehicle insurance policies have been deemed ... for insurers, like GEICO, to which the second sentence of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 applies. From the perspective of the insurers’ obligation, the required ... equal protection claim therefore falls flat. 1. The deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, achieved its present form in 1998, when the Legislature added ... effectuated through New Jersey’s so-called “deemer” statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28- 1.4, which lies at the heart of this appeal. The deemer ... under the policy is used or operated in this State. [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4.] In the second sentence of the deemer statute, the Legislature ... under the policy is used or operated in this State. [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4.] 14 The AICRA amendment to the first sentence -- added ...

docket:	a-27-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-02-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	80420

4 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 858

... 381 (1998). In Park , we held that the deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, under which automobile policies covering certain out-of-state vehicles ...

docket:	a5757-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-04-15
status:	published
citation:	376 N.J. Super. 475
Document Size:	33613

5 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 858

... 381 (1998). In Park , we held that the deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, under which automobile policies covering certain out-of-state vehicles ...

docket:	a4478-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-04-15
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	33589

6 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 858

... 381 (1998). In Park , we held that the deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, under which automobile policies covering certain out-of-state vehicles ...

docket:	a6668-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-04-15
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	33589

7 MARTIN V. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 815

... containing personal-injury-protection (PIP) benefits. Since 1977, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (the conformity statute), an insurance company must, in accordance with ... in excess of $75,000 paid under the conformity statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. 1. The language of the relevant statutes do not plainly ... of PIP benefits as are required under New Jersey law. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Therefore, as a condition of doing business in New Jersey ... the $75,000 paid under New Jersey's conformity statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. I ����For purposes of this appeal, we rely generally on ... 4a. (Medical expense benefits are a form of PIP benefits.) N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, should be construed with N.J.S.A. 39:6 ... certification. 139 N.J. 184 (1994). II ����The conformity statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, provides: ������������Any insurer authorized to transact or transacting automobile ...

docket:	a-114-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-07-31
status:
citation:	141 N.J. 279
Document Size:	46930

8 K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick LLC -- rank: 791

... injury protection coverage required to be provided in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4], or although required did not maintain personal injury protection or ...

docket:	a-33-14
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2016-01-05
status:
citation:
Document Size:	107061

9 Edward Zabilowicz v. Roslyne Kelsey -- rank: 770

... threshold applied to Zabilowicz by reason of the Deemer Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Because he did not have a qualifying injury under N ... In this automobile insurance case, under the plain language of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, the Deemer Statute, and N.J.S.A. 39:6A ... N.J. 477, 480-81 & n.1 (2005); see also N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 -- known as the 'Deemer Statute' -- provides benefits and burdens to ... receive PIP benefits on a no-fault basis under 2 N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 apparently acquired its name as the Deemer Statute because it ... us, we must look to the interrelationship between two statutes, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, the Deemer Statute, and 183 N.J. at 492. We ... We first look to the specific language of the Deemer N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 requires insurers authorized to Statute. transact automobile insurance business ...

docket:	a-87-08
court:	supreme
decided:	2009-12-17
status:
citation:	200 N.J. 507 984 A.2d 872
Document Size:	25378

10 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. VS EILEEN CROCKER -- rank: 759

... by virtue of New Jersey's so-called "deemer" statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4? We conclude that she is entitled to arbitrate the dispute ... J.S.A. 39:6A-5c, and our deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 or 39:6A ... policy, shall be subject to the tort option specified in [ N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 (emphasis added).] ����State Farm initially argues that the deemer statute ... deemer statute intimates no such condition precedent to its operation. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. To the contrary, it provides specifically that the requisite New ... the subject vehicle "is used or operated" in New Jersey. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. This is true notwithstanding that, as a practical matter, nonresident ... a provision clearly motivated by a desire for uniformity. Instead, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 makes the underlying out-of-state policies, and the ...

docket:	a3686-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-03-08
status:	published
citation:	288 N.J.Super. 250
Document Size:	18572

11 HAN HUNG LUONG v. FRANK T. GEORGE -- rank: 753

... based on the court's application of the Deemer Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, to plaintiff's claim for non- economic losses.1 On ... specified in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8(a)]. . . . . [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4.] [ 415 N.J. Super. at 592 (alterations in original).] '[T ... an insurer authorized to transact . . . insurance business in this State,' N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, plaintiff's claim was subject to a limitation-on-lawsuit ...

docket:	a0878-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22970

12 Augustine W. Badiali v. New Jersey Manufacturer’s Insurance Group -- rank: 743

... motor vehicle by an individual without liability insurance coverage. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. UM coverage exists to compensate victims injured by an � ...

docket:	A-48-12
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-02-18
status:
citation:	220 N.J. 544 107 A.3d 1281
Document Size:	81125

13 GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 724

... was delivered by LEFELT, J.A.D. The deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, mandates that some automobile insurance companies include within their out ... 1989, L. 1988, c. 119, ' 1, imposed the verbal threshold, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 ] The first notable observation regarding the amendment at issue, the ... of PIP benefits as are required under New Jersey law, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4." Martin , supra , 141 N.J. at 282. But, out-of ... Truck , 295 N.J. Super. 131 , 137 (App. Div. 1996) ( N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 was not applicable where accident occurred in New Jersey involving ... 1997, c. 436, the 1998 amendment, which is codified at N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1, reimbursement ...

docket:	A0995-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-03-25
status:	published
citation:	358 N.J. Super. 555 818 A.2d 474
Document Size:	53396

14 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1312-18.opn.html -- rank: 719

... in liability coverage pursuant to our State’s Deemer Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Travelers also filed a third-party A-1312-18T3 6 ... under the policy is used or operated in this State. [N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4.] 'The Deemer [s]tatute is so named because it 'deems ... 000 per person limits established in the Deemer Statute. See N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4. Under the express terms of the Travelers policy, Travelers was ... applies, there is no choice-of-law issue.'). More succinctly, ' N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 makes the underlying out-of-state policies, and the laws ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	29766

15 JACQUELINE JOHNSON v. REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 713

... paid MEB to its passengers pursuant to our deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, under which automobile policies covering out-of-state vehicles are ...

docket:	A3968-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-16
status:	published
citation:	391 N.J. Super. 194 917 A.2d 803
Document Size:	44663