Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6")   1 to 15 of 17 results. Run time: 0.872 seconds | Search time: 0.865 seconds    
 Page:1 2 Next 2
1 JACQUELINE JOHNSON v. REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 1000
... that the failure to include a statute of limitations in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 while creating a detailed limitations scheme under N.J.S ... the time period for filing suit for MEB payment under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 was governed by the limitations period contained in N.J ... reference to the time deadlines of the automobile PIP statute. N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 provides: a. Every owner, registered owner or operator of a ... relate to automobiles, subject to the PIP benefit deadline, reference N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. Moreover, we have not found any declaration of Legislative intent ... payment of MEB for injured bus passengers as mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6, even though the deemer statute was not amended to specifically ... here that the omission of a statute of limitations in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 for MEB claims "was a legislative 'oversight subject to ...
docket: A3968-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-03-16
status: published
citation: 391 N.J. Super. 194 917 A.2d 803
Document Size: 44663
2 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 993
... bus passenger medical expense benefits (MEB) coverage, as required by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6.     Plaintiffs incurred medical expenses as a result of their injuries ... does not include a bus.     In 1991, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6, which provides for the payment of no fault medical expense ... included in the definition of an automobile set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. Nevertheless, USF&G argues that N.J.S.A. 39 ... USF&G argues that this provision should be read into N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 to impose primary liability for MEB on an injured bus ... be construed to apply to the MEB coverage mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 even though the deemer statute was not amended to specifically reference N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. In addition, we held that an insurer providing MEB ...
docket: a5757-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-04-15
status: published
citation: 376 N.J. Super. 475
Document Size: 33613
3 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 993
... bus passenger medical expense benefits (MEB) coverage, as required by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6.     Plaintiffs incurred medical expenses as a result of their injuries ... does not include a bus.     In 1991, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6, which provides for the payment of no fault medical expense ... included in the definition of an automobile set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. Nevertheless, USF&G argues that N.J.S.A. 39 ... USF&G argues that this provision should be read into N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 to impose primary liability for MEB on an injured bus ... be construed to apply to the MEB coverage mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 even though the deemer statute was not amended to specifically reference N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. In addition, we held that an insurer providing MEB ...
docket: a4478-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-04-15
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 33589
4 CHARLOTTE SCHAEFER v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 993
... bus passenger medical expense benefits (MEB) coverage, as required by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6.     Plaintiffs incurred medical expenses as a result of their injuries ... does not include a bus.     In 1991, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6, which provides for the payment of no fault medical expense ... included in the definition of an automobile set forth in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. Nevertheless, USF&G argues that N.J.S.A. 39 ... USF&G argues that this provision should be read into N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 to impose primary liability for MEB on an injured bus ... be construed to apply to the MEB coverage mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 even though the deemer statute was not amended to specifically reference N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. In addition, we held that an insurer providing MEB ...
docket: a6668-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-04-15
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 33589
5 MARTIN V. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 940
... buses must maintain no-fault medical expense benefits for passengers, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. The UCJF argues that "an insurer [that] has written many ...
docket: a-114-94
court: njsupreme
decided: 1995-07-31
status:
citation: 141 N.J. 279
Document Size: 46930
6 KEI NAM PARK VS EUN BAE PARK, DUCK JU KIM, ET AL -- rank: 837
... 1 (requiring commercial vehicles to maintain automobile liability coverage alone); N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. We agree.     The deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17 ... appreciate that the deemer statute does not explicitly refer to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6, hardly surprising in view of the fact that the deemer ... amend the deemer statute expressly to incorporate the later adopted N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 and, indeed, to amend the earlier adopted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9.1 expressly to incorporate N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 as well, was a legislative "oversight subject to the court ... to amend both these statutes consistently with its adoption of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 was, indeed, just such an oversight and that our failure ... 1.4 to include bus-passenger PIP payments required by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. We deem it necessary to do so here in ...
docket: a3922-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-03-12
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 17585
7 COACH USA, INC., CAPE TRANSIT CORPORATION AND LEISURE LINE, INC. v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, -- rank: 701
... separate accidents with commercial busses, can obtain reimbursement pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 that was equivalent to PIP insurance ( i.e. , bus- PIP ... 1 to specifically include insurers paying bus-PIP, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6, among those insurers entitled to seek reimbursement, determining that the ... coverage was afforded directly to the bus companies pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. Moreover, we focus on the effect of N.J.S ...
docket: A0250-01
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2002-10-01
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 18357
8 MURPHY KNIGHT v. AAA MIDATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 675
... to a provision of a bus insurance policy mandated by N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 is "entitled to an award of counsel fees" pursuant to ...
docket: a3621-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-07-05
status: published
citation: 394 N.J. Super. 333
Document Size: 30966
9 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5568-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 645
... statutorily-mandated first-party medical expense benefit coverage pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. See 354 N.J. Super. at 278. In Coach USA ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 65068
10 MEHERALY MERCHANT v. BRIAN J. VINDICK -- rank: 645
... statutorily-mandated first-party medical expense benefit coverage pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. See 354 N.J. Super. at 278. In Coach USA ...
docket: a3822-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-04-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 65698
11 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3822-12a5568-12.opn.html -- rank: 615
... statutorily-mandated first-party medical expense benefit coverage pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. See 354 N.J. Super. at 278. In Coach USA ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 66033
12 TAHIYYAH JONES v. NASER CITY TRANSPORTATION CORP., et al. -- rank: 612
... automobiles, it was not reluctant to do so expressly. Thus, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 requires the equivalent of PIP insurance for passengers in motor ...
docket: A1419-05
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-11-02
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 31874
13 JASPER T. LYMON v. CAPE TRANSIT CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 609
... obligated to provide PIP benefits to their own passengers under N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. Defendants urged that the verbal threshold statutes contained in Titles ... must be understood.     The legislative mandate for PIP coverage in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 and -1.7. The legislative scheme in N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 and -1.7 is directed solely toward providing coverage for ...
docket: a5773-99
court: njappellate
decided: 2001-05-11
status: published
citation: 340 N.J. Super. 573
Document Size: 9166
14 LEROY NEBINGER VS MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY -- rank: 605
... as to require medical expense benefits (MEB) coverage pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. We hold that such use of the vehicle does not ... is persuasive but not determinative of the issue before us.      N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 provides:         a. Every owner, registered owner or operator of a ...
docket: a4696-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-07-14
status: published
citation: 312 N.J.Super. 400
Document Size: 16557
15 LEROY NEBINGER VS MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY -- rank: 605
... as to require medical expense benefits (MEB) coverage pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6. We hold that such use of the vehicle does not ... is persuasive but not determinative of the issue before us.      N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.6 provides:         a. Every owner, registered owner or operator of a ...
docket: a4662-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-07-14
status: published
citation: 312 N.J.Super. 400
Document Size: 16557
 Page:1 2 Next 2
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!