Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 17:29c-10")   1 to 15 of 15 results. Run time: 0.713 seconds | Search time: 0.706 seconds    
1 WAYNE SAVAGE v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO -- rank: 1000
... also determined that Progressive had complied with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 by mailing to plaintiff a notice stating that the policy ... to cancel the policy in accordance with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10; (3) Progressive's witness presented no evidence that an online ... that Progressive failed to cancel the policy in accordance with N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10. The statute provides: No written notice of cancellation or of ... court's determination that Progressive complied with the requirements in N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10. As noted, Ms. Henry testified that Progressive sent the notice ...
docket: a3358-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-07-27
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26406
2 WILKIE D. BOWEN v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION -- rank: 790
... that it had failed to comply with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10. GEICO does not challenge that part of the order that permitted substituted service. N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 provides, in pertinent part: No written notice of cancellation . . . sent ... Emphasis added.] GEICO argues that it satisfied subsection b of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 through its electronic retention of the notice of cancellation pursuant ... opinion, Judge Kessler reviewed the applicable law and concluded that N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 required a contemporaneous certification of the duplicate copy for a ...
docket: a2517-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-06-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 10700
3 PIERMOUNT IRON WORKS, INC., et al. v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 790
... 228 (1978). True as those distinctions may be, W eathers , N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, and Celino , supra , (which construed N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, as amended, subsequent to the Weathers decision), offer reasonable guidelines ...
docket: a5803-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-12-18
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 77963
4 PIERMOUNT IRON WORKS, INC., et al. v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 790
... 228 (1978). True as those distinctions may be, W eathers , N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, and Celino , supra , (which construed N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, as amended, subsequent to the Weathers decision), offer reasonable guidelines ...
docket: a5788-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-12-18
status: published
citation: 397 N.J.Super. 463
Document Size: 77906
5 PIERMOUNT IRON WORKS, INC., et al. v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 790
... 228 (1978). True as those distinctions may be, W eathers , N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, and Celino , supra , (which construed N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, as amended, subsequent to the Weathers decision), offer reasonable guidelines ...
docket: a6079-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-12-18
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 77963
6 PIERMOUNT IRON WORKS, INC., et al. v. EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 790
... 228 (1978). True as those distinctions may be, W eathers , N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, and Celino , supra , (which construed N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, as amended, subsequent to the Weathers decision), offer reasonable guidelines ...
docket: a5810-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-12-18
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 77920
7 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS VS JEFFREY P. UPHOLD & PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 745
... for effective cancellation of an automobile insurance policy pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10. If that were the determinative issue, we would affirm the ... N.J. Super. 538 (App. Div. 1986) ,         The provisions of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 are designed to insure that named insureds receive appropriate notice ... means of a mailed notice was required.     Because compliance with N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 is apparently still not universal, see , e.g. , Valley Nat ... written notice of cancellation" does not meet the requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10.     Nevertheless, Uphold's silence leaves no genuine dispute of fact ...
docket: a1511-97
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-11-19
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 19038
8 VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORPORATION V. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 737
... J. 228 (1978). True as those distinctions may be, Weathers , N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, and Celino , supra (which construed N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, as amended, subsequent to the Weathers decision), offer reasonable guidelines ... at 231, 235. More is required.     The current provisions of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 reflect a public policy of this state. Although it addresses ...
docket: a0857-97
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-10-27
status: published
citation: 316 N.J.Super. 152
Document Size: 20593
9 NANCY PAWLICK V. NEW JERSEY AUTO FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ET AL -- rank: 705
... that MCA did not comply with the procedural requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 as to Provence, and, secondly, that failure to give notice ... that MCA validly canceled Provence's coverage.     The provisions of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 are designed to insure that named insureds receive appropriate notice ... remained an MCA insured under the policy.     As discussed earlier, N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 sets forth the requirements for notification of cancellation. The section ...
docket: a4453-93
court: njappellate
decided: 1995-10-30
status: published
citation: 284 N.J.Super. 629
Document Size: 23209
10 PATRICK GATTO V. NEW JERSEY AUTO FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOC. -- rank: 685
... to renew and a notice of non-renewal, and that N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 controls only the mailing of notices of cancellation and non ... However, Lopez also explains that while the notice provisions of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10 "do not apply to a JUA policy," 239 N.J ...
docket: a4146-93
court: njappellate
decided: 1995-10-31
status: published
citation: 284 N.J.Super. 665
Document Size: 22801
11 DEBRA ALLYN NOWAKOWSKI v. SELECTIVE WAY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 580
... insurance policy must strictly comply with the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10. 'An insured need not actually receive a cancellation notice in ...
docket: a5416-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-12-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21967
12 ONE BEACON INSURANCE GROUP v. LAKEESHA BROWNLEE -- rank: 544
... of mailing of the notice of cancellation to defendant, under N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, fell short of the standard required under the law. Valley ...
docket: a5039-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-08-01
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 33961
13 STEVEN VERBESKY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 540
... fact that Liberty Mutual had satisfactorily demonstrated, as required by N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, that the first termination had been mailed. The judge also ... to cancel the insured's insurance policy in accordance with N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10." His arguments are that the termination was ineffective because: (1 ...
docket: a3283-07
court: njappellate
decided: 2009-04-22
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 28073
14 HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. YU GUAN -- rank: 495
... insured at its correct address in order to be effective. N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10. There is no dispute that National complied with this requirement ...
docket: a2840-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-03-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 46633
15 AAA MID-ATLANTIC INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. CHISOM ANARAH -- rank: 379
... that GEICO's cancellation notice comported with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 17:29C-10, which provides: No written notice of cancellation or of intention ...
docket: a2421-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-12-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 13227
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!