Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 R.J. Gaydos Insurance Agency, Inc. v. National Consumer Insurance Company -- rank: 1000

... suspension of its obligations to “take all comers,” pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17:33B-19, a provision of FAIRA that prohibits insurers from denying or ...

docket:	a-53-00
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-06-28
status:
citation:	168 N.J. 255
Document Size:	74653

2 R.J. GAYDOS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., t/a SCHUMACHER ASSOCIATES v. NATIONAL CONSUMER INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 928

... obligation to "take all comers," as it could have under N.J.S.A. 17:33B-19. At least theoretically, NCIC could have limited its "exposures" See ...

docket:	a5601-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-06-12
status:	published
citation:	331 N.J.Super. 458
Document Size:	56543

3 BILL SCHELLER v. RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 907

... exemption for insurers who were in a financially unsafe situation. N.J.S.A. 17:33B-19. Even before the enactment of FAIRA, other statutory protections afforded ... for every two new policies it wrote ("two for one"). N.J.S.A. 17:33B-19 would be prohibited from writing new insurance polices unless it ... to avoid submitting an insurance application for such a person. N.J.S.A. 17:33B-19, -20, -23, -24, -28. In addition, after a determination that ...

docket:	A2548-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-05-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59227