Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20")   1 to 9 of 9 results. Run time: 0.916 seconds | Search time: 0.909 seconds    
1 JIAN SHEN, HUI ZHU, v. HYUNDAI MARINE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD -- rank: 1000
... cannot be 'inconsistent with the provisions of th[e] policy,' N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20. Prior to obtaining the policy, plaintiff acknowledged and confirmed that ...
docket: a1731-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-04-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28353
2 Dynasty, Inc. v. The Princeton Insurance Company -- rank: 671
... insured.” This language is standard contract language required by statute, N.J.S.A . 17:36-5.20.     Esposito had stated under oath to Princeton and testified at ... increase-of-hazard” clause is standard language required by statute, N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20. Pursuant to that provision, Princeton requested that the trial court ... might constitute an increase of hazard within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20. Nor is there any legislative history to aid us in ...
docket: a-31-99
court: njsupreme
decided: 2000-07-24
status:
citation: 165 N.J. 1
Document Size: 59014
3 SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARY ANN MAURO et al. -- rank: 620
... matters materially affecting insurability of the risk. Finally, Selective noted N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20 which requires as a standard provision in a fire policy ...
docket: A0574-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-01-23
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 85683
4 SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARY ANN MAURO et al. -- rank: 620
... matters materially affecting insurability of the risk. Finally, Selective noted N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20 which requires as a standard provision in a fire policy ...
docket: A0513-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-01-23
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 85683
5 NORTHRIDGE TENANTS CORPORATION v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD\'S OF LONDON -- rank: 610
... with Hartford Fire Insurance Company contained a provision required by N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20, that no suit could be brought under the policy "unless ... twice as long as the twelve-month period required by N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20 and discussed in Peloso . Lloyd's argues that the length ... Court stated: There obviously is an incongruity in the statute [ N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20]. While the limitation provision purports to give the insured a ...
docket: a4860-07
court:
decided: 2009-06-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 46822
6 AGOSTINHO MATOS, ANA ROSAMATOS et al. v. FARMERS MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SALEM COUNTY -- rank: 563
... and affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs' complaint as untimely. I N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20 sets forth standard provisions that every fire insurance policy must ... the Court construed the phrase "inception of the loss" in N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20 "to allow the period of limitation to run from the ... designated by the Farmers Mutual code "MPL95." In conformity with N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20 as construed in Pelo so , one section of this endorsement ...
docket: a4256-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-03-31
status: published
citation: 399 N.J.Super. 219
Document Size: 53984
7 RIHANNA CORP., RIHANNA RESTAURANT INC., MAHER E SALEEB, SAM TWAL and HOSSAM MIKAAIL v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON / and MAHER MOUSSA -- rank: 548
... be included in every New Jersey fire insurance policy by N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20. See Weinberg v. Dinger , 106 N.J. 469 (1987) (holding ... way, the phrase "inception of the loss" as used in N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20 is construed "to allow the period of limitation to run ... be included in every New Jersey fire insurance policy by N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20. Plaintiffs claimed ignorance does not justify its delayed action in ...
docket: a2643-12
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-11-11
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 30218
8 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1288-19.opn.html -- rank: 545
... is not governed by the Act, but is governed by N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20, which is not applicable here. Elberon Bathing Co. v. Ambassador ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 44640
9 MANUEL CARDOSO v. IRA GOLDBERG, et al. -- rank: 418
... challenged whether the term "actual cash value," as used in N.J.S.A. 17:36-5.20, was the replacement value less depreciation, which had not been ...
docket: a4904-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-11-19
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 57398

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!