Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 17b:26-7")   1 to 1 of 1 results. Run time: 0.762 seconds | Search time: 0.755 seconds    
1 PROVIDENT LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., VS BRUCE A. FEIN -- rank: 1000
... application for reinstatement. The basis of Fein's argument is N.J.S.A. 17B:26-7 which requires incorporation of the following terms for reinstatement in ... for at least 5 years from its date of issue.) [ N.J.S.A. 17B:26-7 (emphasis added).]     For convenience, we restate the critical facts on ... Provident contends that its conduct adhered to the requirements of N.J.S.A. 17B:26-7 because it asked for a reinstatement application and issued a ... of the critical language contained in the first sentence of N.J.S.A. 17B:26-7 is clear. When an insurance company receives an overdue renewal ... for our position may be gleaned from that portion of N.J.S.A. 17B:26-7 which provides that a failure of the insurance company to ... we find that this insurance policy was automatically reinstated by N.J.S.A. 17B:26-7 on the date Fein's check reached the company, ...
docket: a6224-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-04-13
status: published
citation: 310 N.J.Super. 110
Document Size: 47681

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!