Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION FOR ATLANTIC COUNTY FREEHOLDER DISTRICT 3 2020 -- rank: 1000

... were rejected.[ 4] The judge rejected Witherspoon's argument that N.J.S.A. 19:63-26 superseded N.J.S.A. 19:29-1. Citing In ... Div. 1964), in which we interpreted the predecessor statute to N.J.S.A. 19:63-26, the judge noted we held that our election laws should ... for a candidate of their choice. Ibid. The judge concluded N.J.S.A. 19:63-26 and N.J.S.A. 19:29-1 should be ... POINT THREE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO APPLY N.J.S.A. 19:63-26, WHICH PROHIBITS OVERTURNING ELECTIONS DUE TO IRREGULARITIES OR FAILURES IN ... denied access to the polls. She repeats the claim that N.J.S.A. 19:63-26 barred Parker's challenge because the statute limits the court ... 1. The Attorney General urges us to affirm and argues N.J.S.A. 19:63-26 does not supersede 19:29-1. He argues N. ...

docket:	a1205-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-06-29
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	56427

2 CITY OF PERTH AMBOY v. ELAINE M. FLYNN -- rank: 598

... or forwarding of any mail-in ballots prepared or forwarded . . . .' N.J.S.A. 19:63- 26. The record demonstrates the mail-in ballot contained the entirety ...

docket:	a0926-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-06-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19495