Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 19:63-7")   1 to 3 of 3 results. Run time: 0.775 seconds | Search time: 0.768 seconds    
1 IN THE MATTER OF THE ELECTION FOR ATLANTIC COUNTY FREEHOLDER DISTRICT 3 2020 -- rank: 1000
... was primarily a 'Vote-by-Mail' election. .... 13. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 19:63-7 and N.J.S.A. 19:63-9, vote-by ... on behalf of the Atlantic County Clerk. 14. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 19:63-7 and N.J.S.A. 19:63-9, vote-by ... to 'print[] sufficient mail-in ballots . . . for the general election,' N.J.S.A. 19:63-7(a), and directs that '[w]hen mail-in ballots are ...
docket: a1205-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-06-29
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 56427
2 EDWARD CORREA v. ANN GROSSI -- rank: 846
... S.A. 19:23-31 and N.J.S.A. N.J.S.A. 19:63-7, Correa argued that the machine and mail-in ballots likewise ... S.A. 19:23-22.4. Plaintiffs also rely on N.J.S.A. 19:63-7, which requires that mail-in ballots 'shall be as nearly ... of the election ballot to be voted at the election. [ N.J.S.A. 19:63-7 (emphasis added).] A-4883-17T4 7 This section, L. 2009 ... they must be exact duplicates of the machine ballots. See N.J.S.A. 19:63-7. While plaintiffs concede the law is ambiguous on those points ...
docket: a4883-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-04-11
status: Published
citation: 458 N.J.Super. 571 206 A.3d 971
Document Size: 29018
3 CITY OF PERTH AMBOY v. ELAINE M. FLYNN -- rank: 839
... of the ballot as it appeared on the sample ballot; N.J.S.A. 19:63-7 because the mail-in ballot was not as nearly as ... possible [a] facsimile[] of the election ballot'' in accordance with N.J.S.A. 19:63-7, and differed only due to physical space constraints uniquely associated ... Grossi, 458 N.J. Super. 571, 577 (App. Div. 2019). N.J.S.A. 19:63-7 states: 'The mail-in ballots shall be printed on paper ... as possible facsimiles of the voting machine ballots, complied with N.J.S.A. 19:63-7, and were not misleading. We also reject the City's ...
docket: a0926-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-06-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 19495

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!