Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 20:3-27")   1 to 3 of 3 results. Run time: 0.768 seconds | Search time: 0.761 seconds    
1 Township of Piscataway v. South Washington Avenue, LLC -- rank: 1000
... any withdrawal thereof, shall not be evidential in such determination. [ N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 (emphasis added).] Piscataway contends that this section of the Act ... their property. We are satisfied that Piscataway's interpretation of N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 is sound, particularly when it is construed in light of ... New Jersey cases cited above. It is also consistent with N.J.S.A. 20:3-27. 1 We should add that some of the earlier out ... W. 2d at 925-26. Thus, the main point of N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 is preservation of the right to appeal on the amount ... Okonite-Callender Cable Co. , 3 N.J. 253 , 265 (1949), N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 is best understood as limiting the appeal to damages and ...
docket: A4094-05
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-05-14
status: Published
citation: 400 N.J.Super. 358 947 A.2d 663
Document Size: 53601
2 Township of Piscataway v. South Washington Avenue, LLC -- rank: 1000
... any withdrawal thereof, shall not be evidential in such determination. [ N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 (emphasis added).] Piscataway contends that this section of the Act ... their property. We are satisfied that Piscataway's interpretation of N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 is sound, particularly when it is construed in light of ... New Jersey cases cited above. It is also consistent with N.J.S.A. 20:3-27. 1 We should add that some of the earlier out ... W. 2d at 925-26. Thus, the main point of N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 is preservation of the right to appeal on the amount ... Okonite-Callender Cable Co. , 3 N.J. 253 , 265 (1949), N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 is best understood as limiting the appeal to damages and ...
docket: A3648-05
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-05-14
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 53433
3 HARRISON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. AMARAL AUTO CENTER, INC., et al. -- rank: 768
... deposit precludes its challenges on appeal, the Agency relies on N.J.S.A. 20:3-27, which provides that "[n]either the making of the deposit ... upon Amaral, even if the Agency's novel interpretation of N.J.S.A. 20:3-27 were correct. III. Because we find it necessary and just ...
docket: A3862-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-02-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 70944
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!