Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 20:3-6")   1 to 15 of 82 results. Run time: 0.669 seconds | Search time: 0.662 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 Next 15
1 of Kearny v. Discount City of Old Bridge -- rank: 1000
... so, whether the condemning authority has a statutory obligation under N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 of the Eminent Domain Act of 1971 (Eminent Domain Act ... public entities to engage in bona fide negotiations with condemnees. N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. Just compensation is intended to place the condemnee “in ... such other matters as may be required by the rules. [ N.J.S.A. 20:3-6.] Above all else, those obligations must “be construed and ... relieve DVL of its obligation, on behalf of Kearny, under N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. VIII. Because DVL contends that the condemnation clause in its ... condemnee holding the title of record to the property.” N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. The majority quite rightly observes that absent a specific contractual ... of that interest –- entwined with the formal requirements of N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 that ensure procedural fairness between negotiating parties and that ...
docket: a-76-09
court: New Jersey Supreme Court
decided: 2011-03-17
status:
citation:
Document Size: 129728
2 62-64 Main Street, L.L.C. v. Mayor and Council of the City of Hackensack -- rank: 917
Original Wordprocessor Version This case can also be found at 221 N.J. 129 or 110 A.3d 877. (NOTE: The status of this decision is Published .) SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the ...
docket: A-19-13
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2015-03-23
status:
citation: 221 N.J. 129 110 A.3d 877
Document Size: 278831
3 Borough of Merchantville v. Malik & Son, LLC -- rank: 898
... N.J.S.A. 20:3-1 to -47, specifically N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, requires a condemning authority to engage in bona fide negotiations ... the title of record to the property being condemned . . . .” N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 (emphasis added). N.J.S.A. 20:3-2(c ... Transportation v. Carroll , 123 N.J. 308, 323 (1991) (citing N.J.S.A. 20:3-6). In addition, this Court has determined that the “one ... “holding the title of record to the property” under N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 does not recognize real parties in interest or those more ... record. (pp. 22-24) 5. The Court’s holding that N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 limits negotiations to the record titleholder leads to the ...
docket: A-66-12
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2014-08-07
status:
citation:
Document Size: 89819
4 TOWNSHIP OF PEMBERTON v. ROCCO AND ANTONIA BERARDI -- rank: 852
... redevelopment plan that it had previously adopted. As required by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, Pemberton attempted but was unable to acquire the property through ...
docket: A0115-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2005-06-16
status: published
citation: 378 N.J. Super. 430 876 A.2d 287
Document Size: 98902
5 HARRISON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. HARRISON EAGLE, LLP, et al. -- rank: 831
... had failed to conduct bona fide negotiations, as prescribed by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, before filing its condemnation complaint. Harrison Eagle moved for reconsideration ... Agency's complaint against Harrison Eagle should be dismissed under N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 for failure to engage in bona fide negotiations. We sustain ... are necessary for the redevelopment of nearby blighted properties. See N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. The trial judge was satisfied that such bona fide negotiations ... here, and we concur with that assessment. In relevant part, N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 provides that no action to condemn shall be instituted unless ... condemnor to acquire the property or possession thereof through negotiations. [ N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 (emphasis added).] As we observed in our recitation of the ... had fully complied with the bona fide negotiations requirement in N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. The judge noted that the Agency had properly submitted ...
docket: a4474-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-02-25
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 72882
6 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3393-15.opn.html -- rank: 826
... engaging in bona fide negotiations with the property owners. See N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. Having held that the DEP properly exercised its power of ... less than a fee simple interest. The very language of N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 requiring the condemnor to identify the property and the interest ... the condemnor to take certain steps prior to commencing litigation. N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. Those steps include appraising the property and engaging in bona ... to accompany the appraiser during the inspection of the property." N.J.S.A. 20:3-6; see also Borough of Rockaway v. Donofrio , 186 N.J ... which the amount of such offered compensation has been calculated[.]" N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. In connection with that offer, the condemnor must engage in ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation: 451 N.J.Super. 214 166 A.3d 239
Document Size: 129157
7 THE BOROUGH OF FORT LEE v. HUDSON TERRACE REALTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 818
... for failure to engage in bona fide negotiations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, which LGIA appeals. We affirm, concluding that the Law Division ... undeliverable--as of March 1, 2004, with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 to start from that date. By letter dated March 2 ... the facts as to whether the actions of plaintiff satisfied N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. The standard of review thus is de novo, and we ... with the condemnee prior to filing a complaint for condemnation. N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. The phrase, "bona fide negotiations," is not defined in the ... J.S.A. 20:3-1 to -50 (the Act). N .J.S.A. 20:3-6 provides, however, that they must include an offer in writing ... value determined by the approved appraisal. Ibid. "The purpose of N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 is to encourage acquisitions without litigation, thus saving both ...
docket: A0334-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2005-11-22
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 74724
8 HARRISON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. AMARAL AUTO CENTER, INC., et al. -- rank: 810
... Amaral's contentions that the Agency was improperly constituted under N.J.S.A. 20:3-6. The trial judge concluded that the record shows that such ... The trial judge concluded that the Agency had complied with N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 because (1) the Agency gave Amaral sufficient notice of the ... the judge erred in finding that the Agency complied with N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 because Polton had considered the zoning ordinances in effect in ... value. In opposition, the Agency contends that it complied with N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, for the reasons that the trial judge noted, and that ... the trial judge's finding that the Agency complied with N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 is supported by substantial proof in the record. Rova Farms ...
docket: A3862-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-02-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 70944
9 CITY OF LONG BRANCH v. LOUIS THOMAS ANZALONE -- rank: 807
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0067-06T2 A-0191-06T2 CITY OF LONG BRANCH, a A-0192-06T2 Municipal Corporation in the ...
docket: a0191-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 157369
10 CITY OF LONG BRANCH v. LOUIS THOMAS ANZALONE -- rank: 807
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0067-06T2 A-0191-06T2 CITY OF LONG BRANCH, a A-0192-06T2 Municipal Corporation in the ...
docket: a0192-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 158238
11 CITY OF LONG BRANCH v. JOYCE MELLILO -- rank: 807
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0067-06T2 A-0191-06T2 CITY OF LONG BRANCH, a A-0192-06T2 Municipal Corporation in the ...
docket: a0195-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 158230
12 CITY OF LONG BRANCH v. LOUIS THOMAS ANZALONE -- rank: 807
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0067-06T2 A-0191-06T2 CITY OF LONG BRANCH, a A-0192-06T2 Municipal Corporation in the ...
docket: a0654-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 157411
13 CITY OF LONG BRANCH v. ALAN A. COOK -- rank: 807
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0067-06T2 A-0191-06T2 CITY OF LONG BRANCH, a A-0192-06T2 Municipal Corporation in the ...
docket: a0197-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 158229
14 CITY OF LONG BRANCH v. MARY MILANO -- rank: 807
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0067-06T2 A-0191-06T2 CITY OF LONG BRANCH, a A-0192-06T2 Municipal Corporation in the ...
docket: a0198-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 158227
15 CITY OF LONG BRANCH v. CARMEN VENDETTI -- rank: 807
Original Wordprocessor Version (NOTE: The status of this decision is Unpublished .) Original Wordprocessor Version NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0067-06T2 A-0191-06T2 CITY OF LONG BRANCH, a A-0192-06T2 Municipal Corporation in the ...
docket: a0196-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 158232
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!