Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1")   1 to 5 of 5 results. Run time: 0.918 seconds | Search time: 0.911 seconds    
1 TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE v. WAYNE TOWNSHIP PRIMARY LEVEL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION -- rank: 1000
... covering the unit. The statute on which [defendant] relies is N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 which states: Every person holding a license issued under section ... It appears to the undersigned that the plain language of [ N.J.S.A.] 26:3-25.1 does apply. The parties' course of dealing in administering its ... and 2010. Each contains the statement that, 'In accordance with N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 which requires Registered Environmental Health Specialists [or 'Sanitarians'] to be ... defendant had no obligation to point out the applicability of N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 'or, that . . . Cantisano would be the only employee to presently ... judge found the arbitrator had not misinterpreted the applicability of N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1. He concluded as follows: Cantisano fits squarely within the statutory ... both parties proving neither intended such a result. Plaintiff argues N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 applies to autonomous boards of health, which it is ...
docket: a4663-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-03-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21882
2 ROBERT VOGT v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 996
... the City seeking an adjustment of their salaries, relying on N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1. 2 That statute provides that: [E]very person holding a ... Division, seeking a mandamus and alleging: (1) the City violated N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 by failing to pay the maximum salary within their respective ... from the City's alleged violations. Judge DeCastro, after quoting N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1, stated: Plaintiffs claim that after five years in a particular ... labor grade level. Therefore, plaintiff's claim that defendant violated N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 fails. We find that these comments disclose an adequate and ... R. Lezynski. 2 In 1996, the year Brown was decided, N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 identified the specific class of workers to whom it applied ...
docket: a1186-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-04-04
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 37695
3 FULVIO STANZIALE et al. v. MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH et al. -- rank: 993
... defendants dismissing plaintiffs' complaint. The complaint sought a declaration that N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1, which mandates that certain local health employees receive the maximum ... The trial judge concluded, as a matter of law, that N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 does not apply to a county board of health. We ... certif. denied , 121 N.J. 617 (1990), which held that N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 does not apply to a sanitary inspector employed by the ... that Mizerak is controlling here.     We begin with the statute. N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 (hereinafter § 25.1) provides:         Every person holding a license issued ... Middlesex County Health Department and sought the salary protections of N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1. We noted that such a health department "is not a ... is not covered by the plain language of § 25.1 [ N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1] which applies only to 'any board of health, municipality ...
docket: a5029-00
court: njappellate
decided: 2002-04-26
status: published
citation: 350 N.J. Super. 414
Document Size: 15693
4 NANCY GERRITY v. COUNTY OF SALEM -- rank: 973
... Mizerak , supra , 230 N.J. Super. at 580 (holding that N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 does not apply to a county health department). We have ... J. Super. at 417-19 (distinguishing Mizerak and holding that N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 "applies to a county board of health"). "[T]he term ...
docket: a0578-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-01-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 45578
5 RITA BROWN ET AL V. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 790
... respective salaries and an award of retroactive pay consistent with N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1. Plaintiffs appeal and defendant cross-appeals from the summary judgment ... the Law Division by which the court attempted to synthesize N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 and the New Jersey Employer-Employee Relations Act, N.J ... City again failed to honor the rights accorded them by N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1 and abrogated the import of the settlement agreement.      N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1, upon which plaintiffs rely, provides in full as follows:             Every ... inclusion in the general salary schedule in the context of N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1. To begin with we are satisfied, as was the trial ... five years. That is clearly correct. For purposes of applying N.J.S.A. 26:3-25.1, we are persuaded that elevation to a higher labor ...
docket: a3861-94
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-04-10
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 20254

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!