Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DENNIS F. GARGANO, JR. -- rank: 1000

... court's suppression of the intercepted, privileged, marital communications. See N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 (providing in part, '[n]o otherwise privileged wire, electronic[,] or ... are not per se unlawful under the Wiretap Act. See N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 (addressing issues related to interception of privileged communications). Although conceding the intercepted marital communications were inadmissible under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, the State claimed suppression of the intercepted non-privileged communications ... 2A:156A-21. And the Wiretap Act includes a provision, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, expressly addressing the interception of privileged communications, but it does ... is otherwise unlawful under the Wiretap Act. To the contrary, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 prescribes a procedure for obtaining a wiretap order for interception ... communications that could reasonably be expected to include privileged communications, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 but the statute does not prohibit the interception of ...

docket:	a1230-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-08-28
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	51180

2 State v. Yolanda Terry -- rank: 905

... provisions of this act, shall lose its privileged character.” N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 (last sentence of section 11). As applied to the marital ... the policies that protect otherwise privileged communications between spouses. See N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11. As a result, conversations between spouses that would otherwise be ... “special need” to wiretap Savoy’s cell phones under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11. Id. at 593-95. That issue is not part of ... o otherwise privileged . . . communication . . . shall lose its privileged character,” N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 –- does not prevent an investigative agent from testifying about ... provisions of this act, shall lose its privileged character.” N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 (section 11). As applied to the marital communications privilege, the ... provisions of this act, shall lose its privileged character.” N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11. The Legislature inserted the word “electronic” in 1993. ...

docket:	A-71-12
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2014-07-22
status:
citation:	218 N.J. 224 94 A.3d 882
Document Size:	105212

3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. YOLANDA TERRY -- rank: 905

... A. 2A:156A-1 to -34. Specifically, defendants assert that N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 required the State to show "special need" to monitor Savoy ... language." State v. McDonald , 211 N.J. 4 , 18 (2012). N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 provides in pertinent part: If the facilities from which, or ... shall lose its privileged character. [ Ibid. (emphasis added).] Thus, under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, if the communications are to be intercepted at "a place ... by someone" personally engaged in crime. Ibid. This language in N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 clearly requires that the State show a special need before ... Super. 499 , 513 (App. Div. 2002). Defendants try to stretch N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11's plain language, "place used primarily for habitation by a ... §§ 1-24. In particular, that 1993 act amended N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 to cover "electronic communications," L. 1993, c. 29, § ...

docket:	a0218-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-14
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 587 66 A.3d 177
Document Size:	80393

4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY A. MARTINEZ, -- rank: 842

... queries are implicated by the Wiretap Act. Specifically: (1) Does N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, which imposes special requirements for approval of non-consensual wiretaps ... As to the first question, the Public Defender contends that N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 reflects a policy-based intent by the Legislature to subject ... In response, the State and the Attorney General argue that N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, which applies to non-consensual wiretaps, is wholly irrelevant to ... succeed if tried or to be too dangerous to employ.' N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11 specifies 'additional grounds' that must exist to authorize non-consensual ...

docket:	a3479-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-10-29
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	126724

5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TYQUAN FUQUA -- rank: 839

... violated the attorney-client privilege and constitutes a violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11,7 which generally prohibits the interception of attorney-client conversations. 7 N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, which affords special protection to privileged communications, provides in pertinent ...

docket:	a3149-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	144018

6 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1861-16.opn.html -- rank: 631

... with N.J.S.A. 2A:156A- 17(a), (b), N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, and N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-18, respectively. In ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:	454 N.J.Super. 59 184 A.3d 126
Document Size:	65195

7 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAYMOND P. RUSSOMANNO -- rank: 515

... 156A-10, nor the heightened "special need" showing, required under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-11, are applicable here. Those statutes are applicable where the Attorney ...

docket:	a4103-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-07-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62223

8 KATHLEEN SACCI, et al. v. LINDA METAXAS -- rank: 404

... a telephone used primarily by a married couple. Ibid. ( citing N.J.S.A. 2A:156A- 11). Rozycki concluded that forcing a person to inform the community ...

docket:	A2270-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-12-06
status:	published
citation:	355 N.J. Super. 499 810 A.2d 111
Document Size:	45872