Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DENNIS F. GARGANO, JR. -- rank: 1000

... determined suppression of the non-privileged interceptions is mandated under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21, which broadly requires suppression of 'the entire contents of all ... attendant to all wiretap orders, and therefore required suppression under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. As noted, the statute mandates suppression of 'the entire contents ... requirements of' N.J.S.A. 2A:156-12. 3 N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. The court denied the motion. In its written statement of ... under the Wiretap Act and did not require suppression under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 of the non-privileged interceptions that followed it. The court ... the motion to suppress the non -privileged wiretap communications under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21.5 They argued the Supreme Court's holding in State ... communication between Grant and Villa-Grant was not required under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. The State conceded the Court's holding in Bailey ...

docket:	a1230-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-08-28
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	51180

2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM L. SCOTT -- rank: 747

... to -37 (Wiretap Act), which has its own exclusionary remedy, N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21.6 In Worthy, the Court concluded, '[i]n light of ... on the grounds that . . . [t]he communication was unlawfully intercepted.' N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. If the motion is granted, 'the entire contents of all ...

docket:	a0529-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-31
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	76397

3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. TYQUAN FUQUA -- rank: 723

... OF ALL COMMUNICATIONS SEIZED IN CONNECTION TO THE WIRETAP UNDER N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. [POINT II] THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED LEGAL ERROR IN RULING ... AND (3) SUPPRESSION OF THE WIRETAP WAS NOT REQUIRED UNDER N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 WHERE A COURT FINDS THAT THE WIRETAP ACT PROVISION(S ... suppression of evidence. Worthy, 141 N.J. at 381– 86; N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. The suppression remedy for a minimization violation is strictly imposed ... relevant ones would remain admissible. The Legislature responded by amending N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 to provide that any minimization violation would result in the ...

docket:	a3149-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-08-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	144018

4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES FAIR -- rank: 704

... interception authorized by said order. A-2754-17 30 Under N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21, [a]ny aggrieved person in any trial . . . may move to ...

docket:	a2754-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-04-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	453437

5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. IBN M. JONES, -- rank: 673

... the requirements of [N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-12]. [N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21.] A showing of bad faith or an intentional violation or ...

docket:	a3771-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	128108

6 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1861-16.opn.html -- rank: 646

... intercepted wire, electronic or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom.' N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21.3 'If the motion is granted, the entire contents of ... fruits may be 'received in evidence' in either action. See N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21; 18 U.S.C. § 2515. 24 A-1861-16T4 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:	454 N.J.Super. 59 184 A.3d 126
Document Size:	65195

7 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARK JACKSON, -- rank: 565

... the seized evidence. Worthy, 141 N.J. at 380-81; N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. Telephone equipment used by law enforcement officers in the ordinary ...

docket:	a0022-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-07-19
status:	Published
citation:	460 N.J.Super. 258 214 A.3d 211
Document Size:	40257

8 MICHELE STARK v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MICHELE STARK v. SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY -- rank: 539

... communication on the grounds that the communication was unlawfully intercepted. N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21(a). It is not unlawful for a "person not acting ...

docket:	a1758-11 a1758-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-21 2014-05-21
status:	unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	97077

9 State of New Jersey v. Shirley Reid -- rank: 532

... oral communication intercepted unlawfully -- may bring a motion to suppress. N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. But an aggrieved customer whose subscriber information was obtained without ...

docket:	a-105-06
court:
decided:	2008-04-21
status:
citation:	195 N.J. 422
Document Size:	85621

10 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAWUD FITZGERALD -- rank: 522

... barred and procedurally barred under Rule 3:22-4 because N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 requires that all suppression motions for failure to minimize non ...

docket:	a5810-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	144718

11 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAWMEEN FITZGERALD -- rank: 522

... barred and procedurally barred under Rule 3:22-4 because N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 requires that all suppression motions for failure to minimize non ...

docket:	a5814-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	144721

12 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAWSHON FITZGERALD -- rank: 522

... barred and procedurally barred under Rule 3:22-4 because N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 requires that all suppression motions for failure to minimize non ...

docket:	a5134-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-02-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	144721

13 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN G. COSTINO, D.O. -- rank: 510

... be received in evidence in the trial, hearing or proceeding." N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 (emphasis added). Nonetheless, as the Court observed in State v ... describing her oral communication with defendant would not be "derived," N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21, from the unlawfully obtained tape recording. That is because Anderson ...

docket:	a2761-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-08-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59441

14 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. K.W -- rank: 441

... A. 2C:12-3a. Defendant filed a motion pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21 to suppress the telephone communication intercept and any evidence derived ... in violation of the Wiretap Act, or evidence derived therefrom. N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21. Here, the Director had no authority to approve consensual telephone ...

docket:	a6184-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16087

15 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SHAWN SOUTHERLAND -- rank: 441

... communication . . . on the grounds that . . . the communication was unlawfully intercepted." N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-21(a). The Wiretap Act, however, provides an exception for telephone ...

docket:	a4663-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-30
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	58027