Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 2a:17-56.23")   1 to 15 of 33 results. Run time: 0.877 seconds | Search time: 0.870 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 Next 15
1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/trial/cameron-v-cameron.opn.html -- rank: 1000
... the motion filing date of July 18, 2014, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a). Originally, the family court clerk’s office scheduled defendantâ ... child support, retroactively imposed to the motion filing date. Under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a), a court may retroactively establish or increase one’s ... can be unavoidably lengthy. Yet, the anti-retroactivity provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23, which generally prohibit retroactive modification of existing support orders prior ... technical arrears, and statutory interpretation of what must occur under N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a) and (b) once the arrears reach a certain threshold ... increase rather than decrease support, the anti-retroactivity provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A: 17-56.23, may not necessarily apply, and a court may in some ...
docket: Cameron-v-Cameron
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status:
citation:
Document Size: 61987
2 MARY L. DIEMER v. ROY R. DIEMER -- rank: 960
... she was entitled to no support. He also noted that N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a), which he interpreted to prohibit retroactive child support, further ... Finally, we conclude that this relief is not statutorily barred. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a) provides that [n]o payment or installment or an ...
docket: a5249-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-06-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 70569
3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/smiley-v-thomas.opn.html -- rank: 934
... exceeds $2000 is subject 3 to the lien created by N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(b). Simpkins v. Saiani, 356 N.J. Super. 26, 28 ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 22421
4 LORI-ANN K. GIPPLE v. MICHAEL W. ROGERS -- rank: 925
... filed a motion for modification of child support, thereby violating N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a). After carefully reviewing the record in light of the ... part and remanded in part. 4 As a general proposition, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a) precludes the retroactive modification of child support, subject to exceptions. We note that '[u] nder N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a), a court may retroactively establish or increase one's ...
docket: a1726-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-07-27
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32734
5 B.G v. E.G -- rank: 903
... lite child support after a full trial did not violate N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23. Here, defendant has not shown why he would be entitled ...
docket: a0830-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-08-31
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 63580
6 JAMES NEVE v. SHARON LIVINGSTONE -- rank: 820
... Super. 130, 141 (App. Div. 1981)). As a general proposition, N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a) precludes the retroactive modification of child support, subject to exceptions. We note that '[u]nder N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a), a court may retroactively establish or increase one's ...
docket: a2996-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-07-13
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 40816
7 ADAM YALANGO v. MARISSA K. YALANGO -- rank: 811
... the child-support guidelines; and granted retroactive relief contrary to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a). Marissa also argues that the judge erred in awarding ...
docket: a2407-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-02-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16194
8 DAISY D. PASCUAL v. JOSEPH J. KOLLMER -- rank: 807
... CLARIFY THIS ERROR. II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY CITING N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a) IN ITS DENIAL OF THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ... CORRECT ADMINISTRATIVE AND ACCOUNTING ERRORS IN CHILD SUPPORT ACCOUNT CS82318843A. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a) SUPPORTS HAVING THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL CHILD ...
docket: a1853-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-06-21
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 9800
9 GINA IDELL v. MICHAEL IDELL -- rank: 802
... party. In its written decision, the court first addressed whether N.J.S.A. 2A:17- 56.23 bars a retroactive modification of defendant's child support beyond ...
docket: a3662-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-05-12
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 42794
10 KIMBERLY ROBINSON v. ARMANDO ONORATI -- rank: 793
... The judge acknowledged that '[a]lthough the retroactivity statute, specifically N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23[a,] does not prohibit the retroactive diminution of child support ...
docket: a4687-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-03-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41966
11 R&K ASSOCIATES, LLC v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 793
... rejecting the argument in Simpkins that in certain subsections of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(b) the term "net proceeds" should include the "entire proceeds ...
docket: a4177-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-04-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 61379
12 DAVID L. JOHNSON v. PATRICIA M. JOHNSON -- rank: 785
... child support. Plaintiff filed his initial application in June 2011. N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23, permits, but does not mandate, retroactive reduction "with respect to ...
docket: a2152-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-08-15
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30186
13 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2386-16a0122-17.opn.html -- rank: 767
... by not acknowledging or adhering to the full context of N.J.S.A. 2A:17- 56.23(a) by not applying [the] over payment of alimony to ... and that Aaron believes this to be a violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a). Specifically, he believes because his alimony obligation was terminated ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 34534
14 JOHN J. POPE, SR v. DEBRA POPE -- rank: 723
... the child support arrears. In her submissions, Debra argued that N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23 precluded a retroactive modification of child support; child support was ...
docket: a2779-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-03-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 40783
15 JUDITH BEYRENT v. DANIEL L. BEYRENT -- rank: 723
... We add the following comments. Defendant acknowledges that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a), "[n]o payment or installment of an order for ... on behalf of their child. Because we have held that " N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a) does not bar the cancellation of child support arrearages ... He is therefore subject to the anti-retroactivity provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23(a). Affirmed. This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...
docket: a5184-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-10-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15378
 Page:1 2 3 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!