Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 KIMBA MEDICAL SUPPLY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NJ -- rank: 1000

... that certain language within a related portion of the APDRA, N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 ("Section 14"), fortified his decision to remand the matter back ... application for that relief is directed shall confirm the award. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 (emphasis added).]   Judge Peterson determined that, insofar as his remand ... a final, and definite award was not made. Pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14], I am remanding this back to the NAF to assign ... I think the . . . position argued by [the] NAF [  that N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 does not apply to PIP arbitration disputes  ] does not ... in accordance with the alternative resolution agreement of this act. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 (emphasis added).] This language in Section 14 authorizes a rehearing ... Upon vacating an award pursuant to [S]ection 13 . . . ." See N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 (emphasis added). The language in Section 14 is discretionary ( ...

docket:	a1902-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-05
status:	published
citation:	431 N.J.Super. 463 70 A.3d 725
Document Size:	93859

2 KIMBA MEDICAL SUPPLY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NJ -- rank: 1000

... that certain language within a related portion of the APDRA, N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 ("Section 14"), fortified his decision to remand the matter back ... application for that relief is directed shall confirm the award. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 (emphasis added).]   Judge Peterson determined that, insofar as his remand ... a final, and definite award was not made. Pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14], I am remanding this back to the NAF to assign ... I think the . . . position argued by [the] NAF [  that N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 does not apply to PIP arbitration disputes  ] does not ... in accordance with the alternative resolution agreement of this act. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 (emphasis added).] This language in Section 14 authorizes a rehearing ... Upon vacating an award pursuant to [S]ection 13 . . . ." See N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 (emphasis added). The language in Section 14 is discretionary ( ...

docket:	a1443-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-05
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	93684

3 COMPREHENSIVE PAIN SOLUTIONS OF NEW JERSEY PC v. OMNI INSURANCE COMPANY c/o GOOD 2 GO AUTO INSURANCE -- rank: 654

... to vacate or modify, the arbitration award shall be confirmed. N.J.S.A. 2A:23A- 14. N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-18(b) provides that ...

docket:	a0862-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-03-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27139

4 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION v. USA CHIROPRACTIC -- rank: 633

... the June 2011 remand order. The primary question is whether N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 authorized the judge to remand the PIP arbitrations to Forthright ... determination de novo, the judge remanded the arbitrations pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 which provides that [u]pon vacating an award pursuant to ... of this act. [(Emphasis added).] Thus, the plain language of N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 authorized the judge to properly remand the PIP matters. Finally ... pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:23-13. And, N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 allows for a rehearing before a new arbitrator to replace ...

docket:	a0904-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21547

5 DR. AMRISH PATEL v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 627

... A. 2A:23A-13 does not allow remands and that N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14 does not apply to PIP arbitrations. This contention is utterly ... remedies authorized by that statute, which are set forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:23A-14. The court's power to remand a case to an ...

docket:	a0394-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16672

6 COMPLETE CARE v. GEICO -- rank: 418

... supra , 431 N.J. Super. at 489-90. See also N.J.S.A . 2A:23A-14 (authorizing a remand for a rehearing before the dispute professional ...

docket:	a0171-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22304