Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ARUN GAIKWAD, -- rank: 1000

... accessing" a computer system; (5) charge the "affirmative defenses" of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33 and 283 N.J. Super. 556, 573-574 (App. Div ... the judge erred in not charging the "affirmative defenses" under N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33 and N.J.S.A. 2C:20-27b. Preliminarily, the New Jersey Criminal Code does not designate either N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33 or N.J.S.A. 2C:20-27b provides that ... 2C:20-27b.     Next, we address Gaikwad's claims regarding N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33. E.     Gaikwad further argues that the charge on N.J ...

docket:	a4341-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-03-11
status:	published
citation:	349 N.J. Super. 62
Document Size:	50438

2 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRIAN L. BRADY -- rank: 885

... by clear and convincing evidence, the affirmative defense codified in N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33. In response to the State's appeal, defendant argues the ... FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT THE CONVICTIONS SHOULD BE DISMISSED AS PER N.J.S.A. 2C:20- 33[,] THE VALUE OF THE COMPUTER ACTIVITY WAS TRIVIAL, THAT IS ... knowingly' state of mind. Defendant also argues that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33, he did not commit a computer related crime under N ... activity.' The State argues defendant is procedurally barred from raising N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33 as an affirmative defense because he did not raise the ... 10-2(c) (emphasis added).] Defendant's affirmative defense under N.J.S.A. 2C:20-33 is predicated on the value of the information he criminally ...

docket:	a3172-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38504