Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Riley v. New Jersey State Parole Board -- rank: 1000

... for the continuous, satellite-based monitoring of sex offenders,” N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92, “24 hours per day, seven days per week,� ... an offender is in compliance with the program’s conditions. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92(b), (c). The Parole Board Chairman is authorized to promulgate guidelines to effectuate the program. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92(d). Noncompliance with the conditions of the program is punishable ...

docket:	A-94-11
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2014-09-22
status:
citation:	219 N.J. 270 98 A.3d 544
Document Size:	159048

2 GEORGE C. RILEY v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD -- rank: 989

... continuous, satellite-based monitoring of sex offenders in this State." N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92(a). It also requires the Chairman to "promulgate guidelines to effectuate the provisions of this act." N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92(d). It is at least arguable that the detailed provisions ...

docket:	a1004-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-22
status:	published
citation:	423 N.J. Super. 224 32 A.3d 190
Document Size:	113372

3 H.R. v. New Jersey State Parole Board -- rank: 866

... using an ankle device with Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92. Plaintiff H.R. is a convicted sex offender. His sentence ... satellite-based monitoring of sex offenders in this State.” N.J.S.A. 30:4- 123.92(a). When enacting SOMA as a permanent program, the Legislature ... was in the proximity of such reported crime incidents.” N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92(b). SOMA further directs the Board to “develop procedures ... with 14 the terms and conditions of the program.” N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92(c). Any report of noncompliance is investigated immediately by law ...

docket:	a-90-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	0000-00-00
status:
citation:
Document Size:	61490

4 IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF R.O.M -- rank: 424

... the use of a GPS monitoring system for sex offenders. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.92. Although the trial court did not rely on the act ...

docket:	a0514-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-12-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45502