Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Riley v. New Jersey State Parole Board -- rank: 1000

... of the program is punishable as a third-degree crime. N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.95. 3 In 2014 , the Parole Board promulgated regulations defining the ...

docket:	A-94-11
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2014-09-22
status:
citation:	219 N.J. 270 98 A.3d 544
Document Size:	159048

2 APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION APPELLATE DIVISION v. F.W January 14, 2016 -- rank: 886

... 94 (failure to comply with any SOMA monitoring requirement) and N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.95 (interfering with his SOMA-required electronic monitoring device). Defendant also ...

docket:	a1635-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-01-14
status:	published
citation:	443 N.J.Super. 476 129 A.3d 359
Document Size:	54537

3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID F. HOHSFIELD -- rank: 682

... and third-degree interference with a sex offender monitoring device, N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.95, violate the ex post facto clauses of the United States ... third-degree interference with a monitoring device in violation of N.J.S.A. 30:4- 123.95. In April 2015, defendant pled guilty to third-degree stalking ... charged with fourth-degree interference with a monitoring device under N.J.S.A. 30:4-123.95 because the crime under the statute was only a third ...

docket:	a0979-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-05-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18632