Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW BLAIR -- rank: 1000

... sought reinstatement under the rehabilitation provisions of the "Codey Bill," N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.4 to 3.9 (the Act). Respondent concluded that appellant ... he was never served with a Notice of Disqualification (NOD), N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.7. In August 2010, pursuant to the parties' CNA, the ... decision, DHS for the first time invoked the provisions of N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5b, found that appellant did not comply with the requirements ... reinstatement to his former position. DHS stated that: Pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5b], an individual may be able to avoid disqualification under ... convincing evidence, that he or she has been rehabilitated; however, [ N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5b] does not apply to individuals who are currently serving ... the terms of the criminal sentence." DHS also noted that N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.7b requires an individual to petition for a determination ...

docket:	a2029-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-06-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	50806

2 CARMELLA J. HOOD v. KEVIN RYAN -- rank: 886

... interpreted and applied the "Criminal History Background Check Law" (CHBCL), N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.4 to - 3.10, also called the "Codey Bill," and ... charged with second-degree endangering the welfare of a child, N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5 and had not been adjudicated in a court of ... 2006, Beckett was charged with third-degree making terroristic threats, N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5 refers to "conviction[s]," and it was unconstitutional to ... due to the nature of the charges, which fell under N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5 and had not been adjudicated in a court of ... hearing was held, during which Edwards had union representation. Referencing N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5 and the nature of the criminal charges, Thaon argued ... discretion in the manner in that the charges fell under N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.5 and had not been adjudicated in a court ...

docket:	A2859-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-04-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	84378

3 IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN HOTZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 718

... to file the falsification charge within the time required by N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a. The statute provides in pertinent part that a person ... the NJDOC filed the charges within the time required by N.J.S.A. 30:4- 3.11a, and that issue would be resolved after an evidentiary ... within forty-five days after that interview, as required by N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a. The ALJ further found that the NJDOC's decision ... to file the falsification charge within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 30:4- 3.11a. The Commission also determined that the ALJ properly decided ... based on the falsification charge must be reversed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a; (2) the Commission erred as a matter of law ... NJDOC filed the falsification charge within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a. As we stated previously, the statute provides that ...

docket:	a0981-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33976