Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a")   1 to 1 of 1 results. Run time: 0.811 seconds | Search time: 0.804 seconds    
1 IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN HOTZ, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS -- rank: 1000
... to file the falsification charge within the time required by N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a. The statute provides in pertinent part that a person may ... the NJDOC filed the charges within the time required by N.J.S.A. 30:4- 3.11a, and that issue would be resolved after an evidentiary hearing ... within forty-five days after that interview, as required by N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a. The ALJ further found that the NJDOC's decision to ... to file the falsification charge within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 30:4- 3.11a. The Commission also determined that the ALJ properly decided the ... based on the falsification charge must be reversed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a; (2) the Commission erred as a matter of law by ... NJDOC filed the falsification charge within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 30:4-3.11a. As we stated previously, the statute provides that a ...
docket: a0981-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-02-13
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 33976

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!