Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 T.H. v. Division of Developmental Disabilities -- rank: 1000

... 2) of N.J.S.A. 30:6D-3 and N.J.S.A. 30:6D-25 lead us to conclude that it did not and that ... 471 (1993). N.J.S.A. 30:6D-3 and N.J.S.A. 30:6D-25 could not be plainer. They impose the “before age 22 ... exist in N.J.S.A. 30:6D-3 and N.J.S.A. 30:6D-25. That regulation, therefore, is not entitled to deference. In sum ... 3 violates N.J.S.A. 30:6D-3 and N.J.S.A. 30:6D-25 insofar as it adds an eligibility requirement not contemplated by ...

docket:	a-114-05
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-03-01
status:
citation:	189 N.J. 478
Document Size:	56626

2 E.B v. DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES -- rank: 726

... for Division services, an individual must have a developmental disability. N.J.S.A. 30:6D-25. The Division of Developmental Disabilities Act (the Act) defines a ...

docket:	a3258-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-12-10
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	39849