Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 IN THE MATTER OF G.W. -- rank: 1000

... charged with providing "services for eligible persons with developmental disabilities . . . ." N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27. Moreover, "[e]very service for persons with developmental disabilities offered ... eligible individual. N.J.S.A. 30:4-25.6; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). It thus required the DDD to provide services "only ... preferred service. N.J.S.A. 30:4-25.6; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). We reject appellants' argument that fiscal constraints are immaterial ...

docket:	a3817-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56673

2 IN THE MATTER OF G.W. -- rank: 1000

... charged with providing "services for eligible persons with developmental disabilities . . . ." N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27. Moreover, "[e]very service for persons with developmental disabilities offered ... eligible individual. N.J.S.A. 30:4-25.6; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). It thus required the DDD to provide services "only ... preferred service. N.J.S.A. 30:4-25.6; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). We reject appellants' argument that fiscal constraints are immaterial ...

docket:	a3818-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	56673

3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3817-11a3818-11.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... charged with providing "services for eligible persons with developmental disabilities . . . ." N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27. Moreover, "[e]very service for persons with developmental disabilities offered ... eligible individual. N.J.S.A. 30:4-25.6; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). It thus required the DDD to provide services "only ... preferred service. N.J.S.A. 30:4-25.6; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). We reject appellants' argument that fiscal constraints are immaterial ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	58032

4 IN THE MATTER OF J.S. -- rank: 844

... the agency to promulgate regulations to carry out this mandate. N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-5.6. In issuing ... extent available." N.J.S.A. 30:4-25.6; N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). When the most appropriate service is not available, the ...

docket:	a4132-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-21
status:	published
citation:	431 N.J.Super. 321 69 A.3d 143
Document Size:	45931

5 IN THE MATTER OF M.P a Disabled Adult -- rank: 697

... appropriate functional service to the extent available." In addition, although N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27 requires the DDD director to "[p]rovide services for eligible ...

docket:	a3019-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31629

6 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 IN RE: PRELIMINARY CONTRACT -- rank: 697

... contracting with those programs to provide services to these individuals. N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). Pursuant to this statutory authority, the Division has contracted ... the Center, in order to provide services to its clients. N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(a). The contract modification terms that the Center now challenges ...

docket:	a3672-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27695

7 DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES v. SHIRLEY MINNIX -- rank: 644

... quality of care needed by individuals with developmental disabilities. See N.J.S.A. 30:6D-27(d) (requiring the Division to establish standards for services, including ...

docket:	a2965-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20456