Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 THE PITNEY BOWES BANK, INC. v. ABC CAGING FULFILLMENT -- rank: 1000

... A.D. In this case we consider the effect of N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 and -32 on a levy, pursuant to a writ of ... in the bank account were exempt as unpaid wages under N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 and -32. ABC's president, Patsy O'Brien, certified that ... Bowes responded that the levied funds were not exempt under N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 and -32. In particular, Pitney Bowes contended that the statutes ... benefit of all the papers[.]" The trial judge found that N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 and -32 did not apply to "wages owed after the ... of judicial precedent or legislative history discussing the scope of N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 and -32, the trial court's choice to consider his ... further contends that the trial court erred in finding that N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 and -32 did not apply to its levied payroll ...

docket:	a2287-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-08
status:	published
citation:	440 N.J.Super. 378 113 A.3d 1217
Document Size:	26589

2 FJERSEY CENTRAL ABSORPTION, INC v. KHUBANI ENTERPRISES, INC -- rank: 371

... payable under [p]laintiff's employee taxes and 401K contributions . . . ." N.J.S.A. 34:11-31 (personal property shall not be seized "by virtue of any ...

docket:	a5011-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-11-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21343