Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 THE PITNEY BOWES BANK, INC. v. ABC CAGING FULFILLMENT -- rank: 1000

... decided Pitney Bowes's turnover motion were also exempt under N.J.S.A. 34:11-32. Based upon our scrutiny of these statutes, we agree with ... wages, proceed to execute his process . . . . [ Ibid. (emphasis added).] Additionally, N.J.S.A. 34:11-32 provides that property removed by the sheriff without employees' wages ... became due and owing after the levy were exempt under N.J.S.A. 34:11-32 is not supported by the statute. N.J.S.A. 34:11-32 prohibits the sale of property pursuant to a writ before ...

docket:	a2287-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-08
status:	published
citation:	440 N.J.Super. 378 113 A.3d 1217
Document Size:	26589