Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40")   1 to 8 of 8 results. Run time: 0.801 seconds | Search time: 0.793 seconds    
1 MICHAEL A. TROISE, Plaintiff, et al. v. EXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al. -- rank: 1000
... attorney's fees as may be allowed by the court[.]         [ N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40.] The Act does not require an employee who claims to ... limitation upon the filing of a private civil action under N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40. It simply authorizes an employee who has received less than ... attorney's fees as may be allowed by the court." N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40. Therefore, in the absence of a legislative directive to apply ... is subject to the six-year limitations period provided by N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40. In support of this argument, Extel relies upon N.J ... require an employee's protest filed with the Commissioner under N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40. Although the LAD contains a 180-day limitation period for ... S.A. 34:11-56a25, which is substantially similar to N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40. In its original form, the Wage and Hour Law ...
docket: a5439-99
court: njappellate
decided: 2001-11-21
status: published
citation: 345 N.J. Super. 231
Document Size: 20703
2 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT v. R.I., INC. -- rank: 733
... civil actions by workers or the DOL on their behalf, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40, or debarment from future public-works contracts, N.J.S ...
docket: a1713-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-12
status: unpublished
citation: 197 N.J. 475 963 A.2d 844
Document Size: 57274
3 THOMAS BEST v. C&M DOOR CONTROLS, INC. -- rank: 680
... fees pursuant to the fee-shifting provision of the PWA, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40, while defendant moved for fees pursuant to both the Rule ... entitlement to prevailing wages, among other things the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40, which provides that an employee may commence a civil action ...
docket: a3801-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-19
status: published
citation: 402 N.J. Super. 229 953 A.2d 775
Document Size: 93451
4 Thomas Best v. C&M Door Controls, Inc. -- rank: 569
... PWA provides a fee-shifting remedy to a prevailing employee. N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40. The purpose of that provision has been recognized as an ...
docket: a-57-08
court: supreme
decided: 2009-10-14
status:
citation: 200 N.J. 348 981 A.2d 1267
Document Size: 32992
5 CHRISTOPHER MAIA v. IEW CONSTRUCTION GROUP -- rank: 549
... employee's 'private civil action' under the Prevailing Wage Act, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40, which contains no explicit statute of limitations, was 'clearly a ...
docket: a4012-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-03-01
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 35096
6 JUAN SERRANO v. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES CORP. -- rank: 520
... those wage rates were beneath the prevailing wages mandated by N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40. Apart from these central statutory claims under the FLSA and ...
docket: a0676-08
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-07-30
status: published
citation: 407 N.J. Super. 253 970 A.2d 1054
Document Size: 143703
7 v. GRANT OIL COMPANY, ABLE ENERGY, PARSIPPANY FUEL OIL, EDWARD HSI and AMY HSI and SPARTAN OIL COMPANY - and PETRO INC., JOHNSON OIL COMPANY MEENAN OIL COMPANY d/b/a REGIONAL OIL COMPANY and GRANT OIL COMPANY, ABLE ENERGY, INC PARSIPPANY FUEL OIL C -- rank: 504
... 375 (2002), a case brought under the Prevailing Wage Act, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40, we stated: "When the Legislature creates a statutory cause of ...
docket: a0313-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-08-23
status: published
citation: 432 N.J.Super. 287 74 A.3d 968
Document Size: 45187
8 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. MARION FLORKIEWICZ -- rank: 434
... an employee or employer under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act); N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.40 (providing for "reasonable attorney's fees" under the Prevailing Wage ...
docket: a0522-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-12-04
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 40170

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!