Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 1000

... contract or by statute. The statute FMBA relies on is N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21, which states in part that "[d]uring the pendency of ... contribution until after existing CNAs expire. Contrary to plaintiffs' arguments, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21 and N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.3 create ...

docket:	a4086-10xx
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-27
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	101434

2 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 1000

... contract or by statute. The statute FMBA relies on is N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21, which states in part that "[d]uring the pendency of ... contribution until after existing CNAs expire. Contrary to plaintiffs' arguments, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21 and N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.3 create ...

docket:	a3916-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-31
status:	published
citation:	434 N.J.Super. 393 84 A.3d 989
Document Size:	101618

3 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 1000

... contract or by statute. The statute FMBA relies on is N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21, which states in part that "[d]uring the pendency of ... contribution until after existing CNAs expire. Contrary to plaintiffs' arguments, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21 and N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.3 create ...

docket:	a3274-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	101452

4 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 1000

... contract or by statute. The statute FMBA relies on is N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21, which states in part that "[d]uring the pendency of ... contribution until after existing CNAs expire. Contrary to plaintiffs' arguments, N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21 and N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.3 create ...

docket:	a3868-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-31
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	101451

5 ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE v. PBA LOCAL 325 et al. -- rank: 638

... Employee Relations Commission at the time, the Prosecutor had violated N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21 by "chang[ing] the terms and conditions of employment during ... determination "that the decision to change the vacation benefits violated N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21." She noted that the contractual provision on which the arbitrator ...

docket:	a3504-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-05
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	40019

6 LARRY S. LOIGMAN, ESQ VS THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF MIDDLETOWN, ET AL -- rank: 519

... of the agreement. Footnote: 11 The SOA inappropriately relies on N.J.S.A. 34:13A-21. Since no proceedings were sought before an arbitrator here, this ...

docket:	a0083-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-02-06
status:	published
citation:	297 N.J.Super. 287
Document Size:	42501