Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 34:15-13")   1 to 15 of 24 results. Run time: 0.912 seconds | Search time: 0.905 seconds    
 Page:1 2 Next 9
1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2315-17.opn.html -- rank: 1000
... all rights by the petitioner's dependents as defined by N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 [(Section 13)] arising out of this/these claim petition(s ... and children) are entitled to compensation benefits as provided in N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. The rights of these dependents to compensation are independent and ... who dies during the course of his or her employment. N.J.S.A. 34:15-13.' Cruz, 195 N.J. at 43. Those death benefits 'terminate ... the decedent is still then survived by a minor dependent. N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(j).' Id. at 44. The distinct death benefits payable under ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 33665
2 Luz M. Cruz v. Central Jersey Landscaping, Inc. -- rank: 997
... for one or more dependents, [seventy percent] of wages.” N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. The subsections that had previously set forth the tiered schedule ... percent of wages if there were five or more dependents. N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(a) to -13(e) (2003), amended by L. 2003, c ... statute at sixty-five percent of Perez’s wages. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(d) (2003). Six months after the statute was amended, Cruz ... rate of fifty percent of her decedent’s wages. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(a) (2003). Following the adoption of the statutory amendment, Hohl ... s wages, for a weekly payment of $209.70. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(a) (2003). Despite its initial denial, Kauffman & Minteer later conceded ... percent of her late husband’s wages, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(a) (2003). Following entry of the judgment, the employer, ...
docket: a-34-07
court:
decided: 2008-06-09
status:
citation: 195 N.J. 33
Document Size: 67764
3 Nancy L. Holm v. Daniel M. Purdy -- rank: 928
... death benefit to which they would have been entitled under N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 had he been covered by workers’ compensation insurance at the ... would have awarded his dependents a death benefit pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13.5 In order to award a death benefit to Christopher ... ” N.J.S.A. 34:15-1; see also N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(a) (prescribing the rate for computing the death benefit); N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(f) (defining dependents eligible for a death benefit). In that ...
docket: a-39-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-12-13
status:
citation:
Document Size: 84520
4 VALENTYNA HOHL v. INSULATED DUCT & CABLE CO. -- rank: 895
... revised formula, adopted effective January 14, 2004, subsection a of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 was amended to provide a benefit based on seventy percent ... dependents." L. 2003, c. 253, § 1. The subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 addressing benefits for two, three, four and five or more ... repeal the formula it replaced, it "deleted" the subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that provided the various formulas applicable under prior law, N ... the question of retroactive application of a prior amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that also effectively enhanced benefits for dependents of deceased workers ... after April 5, 1994. Id. at 42. An act amending N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 to eliminate the offset for earnings was adopted on July ... their holding. In Harris , we concluded that an amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 should apply retroactively based on the implicit guidance in ...
docket: A3844-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-05-14
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 91345
5 LUZ M. CRUZ v. CENTRAL JERSEY LANDSCAPING, INC. -- rank: 895
... revised formula, adopted effective January 14, 2004, subsection a of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 was amended to provide a benefit based on seventy percent ... dependents." L. 2003, c. 253, § 1. The subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 addressing benefits for two, three, four and five or more ... repeal the formula it replaced, it "deleted" the subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that provided the various formulas applicable under prior law, N ... the question of retroactive application of a prior amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that also effectively enhanced benefits for dependents of deceased workers ... after April 5, 1994. Id. at 42. An act amending N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 to eliminate the offset for earnings was adopted on July ... their holding. In Harris , we concluded that an amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 should apply retroactively based on the implicit guidance in ...
docket: A3843-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2007-05-14
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 91351
6 Mary Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co -- rank: 862
... benefits in the event of the worker's death. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. The Division of Workers' Compensation held that the worker's ... the Act requires payment of benefits to the workers' dependents. N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. Our cases emphasize that "[t]he rights of dependents to ... 31-1 to -6, and a workers' compensation dependency claim, N.J.S.A. 34:15-13, are statutory causes of action with the same purpose: to ...
docket: a-38-98
court: njsupreme
decided: 1999-08-09
status:
citation: 161 N.J. 178
Document Size: 103217
7 ERIC APPERMAN v. VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF WESTFIELD -- rank: 847
... In this workers' compensation case, the judge of compensation interpreted N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 to limit the payment of dependency benefits to an incapacitated ... application. In a detailed written opinion, the judge found that N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 controlled the payment of dependency benefits, and 'reveal[ed] no ... turns on an issue of law, namely the interpretation of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(i) and (j) regarding the payment of dependency benefits to ... v. Cty. of Bergen, 198 N.J. 408, 421 (2009)). N.J.S.A. 34:15-13, in pertinent part, provides: (i) In computing compensation to those ... majority]. [(Emphasis added).] On appeal, Eric Apperman argues that under N.J.S.A. 34:15- 13, Harold is entitled to continued dependency benefits for as long ... s dependency benefits were limited to 450 weeks pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. Neither party has cited any authority, nor have we ...
docket: a5446-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-10-30
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 34962
8 AUDREY BUSH v. KAUFFMAN & MINTEER, INC. -- rank: 835
... revised formula, adopted effective January 14, 2004, subsection a of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 was amended to provide a benefit based on seventy percent ... dependents." L. 2003, c. 253, § 1. The subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 addressing benefits for two, three, four and five or more ... repeal the formula it replaced, it "deleted" the subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that provided the various formulas applicable under prior law, N ... the question of retroactive application of a prior amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that also effectively enhanced benefits for dependents of deceased workers ... after April 5, 1994. Id. at 42. An act amending N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 to eliminate the offset for earnings was adopted on July ... their holding. In Harris , we concluded that an amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 should apply retroactively based on the implicit guidance in ...
docket: a4379-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-05-14
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 87146
9 RUTH A. HERZER v. CLASSICAL CARS NISSAN, INC. -- rank: 835
... revised formula, adopted effective January 14, 2004, subsection a of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 was amended to provide a benefit based on seventy percent ... dependents." L. 2003, c. 253, § 1. The subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 addressing benefits for two, three, four and five or more ... repeal the formula it replaced, it "deleted" the subsections of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that provided the various formulas applicable under prior law, N ... the question of retroactive application of a prior amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 that also effectively enhanced benefits for dependents of deceased workers ... after April 5, 1994. Id. at 42. An act amending N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 to eliminate the offset for earnings was adopted on July ... their holding. In Harris , we concluded that an amendment to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 should apply retroactively based on the implicit guidance in ...
docket: a4878-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-05-14
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 87147
10 HEIDI DELANE, et al. v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, et al. -- rank: 811
... and children sought dependency benefits from the employer pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. Ibid. The employer asserted full discharge from liability to the ... the rest of the period of her widowhood, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law ...
docket: A1407-99
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2001-07-24
status: published
citation: 343 N.J. Super. 225
Document Size: 35399
11 Cathleen Quinn v. David J. Quinn -- rank: 691
... a civil union couple” for purposes of Family Leave Act); N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 (spouse of deceased eligible for death benefits under workers compensation ...
docket: A-5-14
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2014-05-03
status:
citation: 225 N.J. 34 137 A.3d 423
Document Size: 105208
12 MARINA JUANA ESTRADA v. QUICK CHEK -- rank: 679
... contained in N.J.S.A. 34:15-12 and N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. In the case of death, N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 provides that compensation for one or more dependents shall be ...
docket: a1927-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-07-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 34717
13 ANN DAVIS HARRIS VS BRANIN TRANSPORT, INC., ET AL -- rank: 670
... by earnings after 450 weeks of compensation, as provided in N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. Following the Legislature's amendment of N.J.S.A. 34:15-13, originally provided: This compensation shall be paid, in the case ... be deducted from the compensation thereafter payable to the spouse.... [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(j).] On July 25, 1995, the Workers' Compensation Act was ... period of survivorship, or until such surviving spouse shall remarry.... [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(j).] Thus, the amendment eliminated the credit against continuing dependency ... in part , 35 N.J. 500 (1961). Under pre-amendment N.J.S.A. 34:15-13, the employer was entitled to an offset for the amount ... until the dependent's income is actually obtained "from employment." N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(j) (amended 1995). It is an advantage that depended ...
docket: a2635-96
court: njappellate
decided: 1998-05-22
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 27308
14 NANCY L. HOLM v. DANIEL M. PURDY -- rank: 658
... resulted from a work-related injury, illness, or medical condition. N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(a), (h). 'Dependent' is defined by the Act to include the deceased employee's wife and children under eighteen. N.J.S.A. 34:15-13(f). 'To succeed in an action against an insurance broker ...
docket: a1529-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-07-16
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 66138
15 CAROL A. LEONARD v. MID-STATE SPRINKLER, INC. -- rank: 649
... dependency benefits to petitioner-respondent, Carol A. Leonard, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-13. The JOC held that petitioner's husband, decedent Lawrence Leonard ... average weekly salary exceeded the percentage that was applicable under N.J.S.A. 34:15-13 at the time of Leonard's death in 1997. Pursuant ...
docket: a4952-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-05-20
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 60789
 Page:1 2 Next 9
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!