Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Walter Sroczynski v. John Milek -- rank: 1000

... or substantially complied with the statutory requirements set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 for cancelling a policy, by its use of the electronic ... to the New Jersey Commissioner of Banking and Insurance. Under N.J.S.A. 34:15-81, to cancel workers’ compensation coverage, the insurance carrier must send ... N.J. 272 (2007). HELD : A carrier does not satisfy N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 merely by transmitting electronic notice of cancellation of coverage to ... notice was provided to the insured. 1. The language of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 is clear, requiring carriers to file a certified statement with ... cannot be effective in light of the unambiguous demands of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81. (p. 8) 2. This case does not satisfy the purposes ... confusing advice, the fact remains that the clear requirements of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 were not satisfied, nor was substantial compliance effectuated. This ...

docket:	a-68-07
court:
decided:	2008-12-17
status:
citation:	197 N.J. 36
Document Size:	115868

2 M&S WASTE SERVICES, INC v. PRAETORIAN INSURANCE CO -- rank: 798

... complied with its statutory obligations for cancelling the policy under N.J.S.A. 34:15-81(b), thus granting the motion in part. Finding the factual ... statutory requirements for cancelling the workers' compensation policy, requires discussion. N.J.S.A. 34:15-81, the statute that governs cancellation of workers' compensation policies, provides ... paragraph 'a' of this section has been given,' complied with N.J.S.A. 34:15-81(b). The Supreme Court addressed the certified statement requirement in ... the reasons we expressed, adding that '[t]he language of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 is clear and unambiguous, allowing for no interpretation other than ... effective in light of the clear and unambiguous demands of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81(b).' Ibid. The Court also emphatically rejected NJM's argument ... given to the employers in accordance with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81. The certification is signed by Ernest Rogers, Madison Consulting ...

docket:	a4860-15
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-08-24
status:
citation:
Document Size:	27991

3 JANICE DAVIS v. YASSIEN MOBILITY ASSISTANCE & AMBULANCE -- rank: 632

... respondent Yassien Mobility Assistance & Ambulance, Inc. (Yassien) was ineffective under N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 and, consequently, Zurich was liable for coverage for an April ... reverse. In order to cancel a workers' compensation insurance policy, N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 provides as follows, in pertinent part: Any contract of insurance ... required by paragraph "b" of this section has been made. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 (emphasis added).] Zurich issued a policy to Yassien, effective November ... electronic transmission did not include the certified statement required by N.J.S.A. 34:15-81(b). Yassien did not make any premium payments following the ... because Zurich did not file the certified statement required by N.J.S.A. 34:15-81(b). Zurich responded that Yassien's seven-year delay in ... Zurich's motion, ruling there must be strict compliance with N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 and Zurich did not file the required certified statement. ...

docket:	a0356-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17867

4 WALTER SROCZYNSKI v. JOHN MILEK, t/a JOHN MILEK CONSTRUCTION -- rank: 611

... because NJM had not fully complied with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 when it provided notice to Milek of the cancellation of ... NJM's arguments that its cancellation procedures substantially complied with N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 and that the judge of compensation erred when she concluded ... to Sroczynski's injury. As required by the provisions of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81, NJM also filed "like notice" of that cancellation with the ... required by paragraph "b" of this section has been made. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 (emphasis added).] As previously stated, it is undisputed that NJM ... its responsibility to comply with the "certified statement" requirement of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81, including the "certified statement" requirement. Because NJM did not do ... regular mail, in contravention of the certified mail requirement of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81. To sanction an improper method of cancellation of a ...

docket:	A3103-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-02
status:	published
citation:	396 N.J.Super. 248 933 A.2d 931
Document Size:	49240

5 MANUELA CARREON v. HOSPITALITY LINEN SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 552

... the notice of cancellation requirements in the Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-81. This is the question before us: Is a carrier required ... request to cancel as if originating from the insured himself. N.J.S.A. 34:15-81. This statute is part of the Workers' Compensation Act. It ... by any law of this State to effect such insurance. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 (emphasis added).] PMA argues that the request to cancel the ... J.S.A. 17:16D-13 control. The provisions in N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 remain applicable, to the extent they are incorporated by reference ...

docket:	A1818-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-07-18
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	43084

6 AMERICAN MILLENNIUM INSURANCE COMPANY v. MAINOR BERGANZA and JOSE ARIAS -- rank: 463

... amended judgment consistent with this opinion. Text Box Footnote: 1 N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 requires the employer to give at least ten days notice ...

docket:	a5312-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-07-17
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	26052

7 ANDREA ONGARO v. COUNTRY FLOORING ENTERPRISES -- rank: 439

... satisfy the requirement of "registered mail" for cancellation notices under N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 also requires the insurer to transmit a "like notice" to ... insured called for by subsection (a) has been issued. See N.J.S.A. 34:15-81, dates back to 1917, no reported case law identifies the ... In sum, because we do not equate "like notice" under N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Any contract of insurance ...

docket:	A1965-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-01-17
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	33205

8 US Bank National Association v. Maryse Guillaume -- rank: 426

... policy cancellation for the notice by registered mail mandated by N.J.S.A. 34:15-81, in reliance on “confusing advice” from the New Jersey ...

docket:	A-11-11
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2012-02-27
status:
citation:	209 N.J. 449 38 A.3d 570
Document Size:	50374

9 JORGE URENA CALDERON v. ERFREN JIMENEZ, et al. -- rank: 356

... issued, Hartford was obliged to comply with the requirements of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 in order to effect cancellation. ����In the absence of any ... in applying it to insurance carriers by requiring compliance with N.J.S.A. 34:15-81. A court "places great weight on the interpretation of legislation ...

docket:	a6323-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2003-01-14
status:	published
citation:	356 N.J. Super. 513
Document Size:	12142

10 MARIO POZADAS v. CAPITAL IRON ASSOCIATES, LLC -- rank: 335

... 0162-22 4 not comply with the statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 34:15-81 because, among other reasons, Hartford did not provide the requisite ...

docket:	a0162-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-30
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16713

11 AMB PROPERTY, LP ET AL. VS. PENN AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL -- rank: 332

... notice of cancellation provided in the Employers' Liability Insurance Law, N.J.S.A. 34:15-81. Id. at 506. We concluded, citing N.J.S.A ...

docket:	a1248-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-14
status:	published
citation:	418 N.J. Super. 441 14 A.3d 65
Document Size:	46880