Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4963-15.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... of the employees of that employer. I believe it's [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-87]. If that law is applied, clearly when Public Service wrote ... the amendment to the policy did not apply retroactively; (4) N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 is inapplicable because Hanover insured the New Jersey locations; and ... Public Service also argues that the judge's application of N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 to this case was "misguided" as it is "undisputed" that ... at the Jersey City location. Accordingly, Public Service argues that N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 "does not apply to this case because the location that ... excluded from the policy was 'concurrently separately insured' by Hanover." N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 states in pertinent part: No policy of insurance against liability ... 1996), certif. denied , 148 N.J. 461 (1997), we interpreted N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 to mandate workers' compensation coverage "for all business related ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	53404

2 JEFFREY LOHMEYER VS FRONTIER INS. CO -- rank: 821

... Lohmeyer argues that the judge ignored the clear dictates of N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 in reaching his decision, disregarded ambiguities in Frontier's policy ... Racing Commission (Racing Commission). Lohmeyer relies on the requirement in N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 mandating workers' compensation coverage for all business related activities, even ... or who were unable to obtain, traditional workers' compensation coverage.      N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 provides:             No policy of insurance against liability arising under this ... of this action.     Attempting to avoid the comprehensive thrust of N.J.S.A. 34:15-87. Indeed, the exemption in Section 87 is satisfied only if ... clearly except Frontier from the applicability of the provisions of N.J.S.A. 34:15-87, nor from the provisions of the subject policy.     The judge ... policy is not a basis for rewriting the policy or N.J.S.A. 34:15-87.     As the record provides no indication that other insurance ...

docket:	a938-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-11-06
status:	published
citation:	294 N.J.Super. 547
Document Size:	25822

3 THE TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. HES TRANS INC v. DISTRIBUTION COOPERATIVE NETWORK OF NEW YORK and TRUCKING SUPPORT SERVICES LLC -- rank: 729

... the legislative scheme of insuring Workers' Compensation benefits' and on N.J.S.A. 34:15-87. Travelers contends this public policy rationale was appropriate. It argues ... of such policy which violates any provision of this section. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-87 (emphasis added).] The purpose of this statutory provision is to ...

docket:	a5284-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31372

4 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. BROADWAY MOVING & STORAGE, INC. -- rank: 660

... N.J.S.A. 34:15-70 to -95.5]. [ N.J.S.A. 34:15-87.] See also Lohmeyer v. Frontier Ins. Co. , 294 N.J ... his entire liability" under the New Jersey Workers' Compensation Act. N.J.S.A. 34:15-87. The certificates of insurance do not prove that the Legion ...

docket:	A0582-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-12-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53951

5 MATTHEW RADER v. OMNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. -- rank: 589

... assured on account of his entire liability under" Title 34. N.J.S.A. 34:15-87. Because N.J.S.A. 34:8-72 expressly provides ...

docket:	a0576-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-10-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	71374

6 LILIA ORELLANA v. ELIEZER ZAKLIKOVSKY -- rank: 489

... RCA, thereby depriving Chabad of worker's compensation coverage under N.J.S.A. 34:15-87; and (4) denying Chabad its due process rights because the ...

docket:	a0780-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-10-31
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14234