Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 GEORGE A. WILHELM v. RYDER LOGISTICS TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS -- rank: 1000

... In these four back-to-back appeals, we consider whether N.J.S.A. 34:15- 95.5 requires a triennial redetermination of petitioners' combined awards of state ... Compensation Act in conjunction with the social security offset under N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5. At that time, he was working for the controller's ... he and the judges agreed that the formula enunciated in N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5 requires an offset if the 'total of the weekly worker ... and subsequent Fund benefits in New Jersey. Crider concluded that N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5 did not support a triennial redetermination. He also noted that ... and stated the calculations were accurate and in compliance with N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5. A-3770-18 6 Petitioners presented Alan Polonsky as a ... decision issued December 13, 2018, the judge of compensation found N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5 did not compel a triennial redetermination of ACE to ...

docket:	a3770-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-06-21
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	28961

2 TAMI ROSALES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT JUDICIARY -- rank: 744

... month as the maximum compensation benefit payable at this time. N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5. This number times 12, divided by 52 gives a weekly ... exceed that allowed by 42 U.S.C. §424a . See N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5. After sufficient monies are accrued, her benefits payable by the ...

docket:	A2110-02
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-11-08
status:	published
citation:	373 N.J. Super. 29 860 A.2d 929
Document Size:	52061

3 WAYNE WOOD v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP -- rank: 630

... disability benefits, respondent was entitled to a credit, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5, in the amount of $155.41 per week, thus reducing ... disagree and hold that the Social Security Benefits offset under N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5 does not continue where petitioner's dependent no longer receives ... state and federal benefits to 80% of [pre-disability earnings]"). N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5, effective August 21, 1980, provides in pertinent part that compensation benefits received by an employee under N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5 "complement[] the set-off provision of the Social Security Act ...

docket:	a3317-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-02-17
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	32949

4 JOHN C. MCALLISTER VS RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & CASINO, ET AL -- rank: 607

... Injury Fund would be entitled to an offset pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5 based upon petitioner's receipt of Social Security disability benefits ... State statutes, see 42 U.S.C. §424a (a)(7); N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5, federal regulations, see 20 C.F.R. § 404.408(i ... benefits a claimant receives as New Jersey does pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5).     The above statutes and authorities clearly establish that workers' compensation ...

docket:	a6851-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-03-31
status:	published
citation:	299 N.J.Super. 199
Document Size:	11583

5 JOSEPHINE LUCCIOLA v. HOME DEPOT -- rank: 597

... Super. at 254. 3 New Jersey is such a state. N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5 provides that for persons under the age of 62 receiving ...

docket:	a3055-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-07-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23935

6 JAMES BARACIA v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM - -- rank: 550

... contribution constitutes compensation payment against which it is entitled under, N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5, to offset the employee's federal social security disability benefits ... or is the counsel-fee payment 'compensation benefit' pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-95.5." Ibid. So too here. We are persuaded that the Board ...

docket:	a3611-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-13
status:	published
citation:	420 N.J. Super. 1 18 A.3d 220
Document Size:	20900