Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Joel S. Lippman, M.D. v. Ethicon, Inc. -- rank: 1000

... impose an exhaustion requirement, it has said so clearly. Through N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, the Legislature has required prior notice to the employer and ... Division exceeds the obligation expressly imposed by the Legislature under N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, which requires only notice and opportunity to correct. For all ...

docket:	A-65-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-07-15
status:
citation:	222 N.J. 362 119 A.3d 215
Document Size:	107878

2 SINEAD NORENIUS v. MULTALER, INC., d/b/a YON-KA USA a Corporation, and HERVE PONTACQ - -- rank: 989

... a reasonable opportunity to correct the activity, policy or practice. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-4] However, the Legislature has created two exceptions to the notice ... and fraudulent solicitation of charitable contributions were committed by management. N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 also dispenses with the notice requirement when "the employee is ...

docket:	a4481-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-09-11
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	90620

3 MARY STEINHAUER-KULA v. MILLVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 951

... of the breach of PARCC protocols constituted whistleblowing, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, she could not allege a CEPA cause of action because ... a reasonable opportunity to correct the activity, policy or practice. [N.J.S.A. 34:19-4.] 'CEPA defines 'retaliatory action' as the 'discharge, suspension or demotion ...

docket:	a0389-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-02-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29983

4 MICHAEL BARBOUR v. ASBURY PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY -- rank: 940

... for his failure to comply with the notice requirements under N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. The motion judge found plaintiff failed to provide his supervisor ... facts of this case by the notice exception provision in N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, which relieves an employee of having to give written notice ... plaintiff's alleged failure to comply with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, which provides, in its entirety, as follows: The protection against ... plaintiff's arguments with respect to the notice provision in N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, but found "no credible evidence on this record, even giving ... motion judge rejected. In response, defendants agree that in adopting N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, the Legislature intended to afford employers the opportunity to investigate ... directly addressing the preclusive effect of the notice provision in N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. 2 The Supreme Court has recently reaffirmed that "[i] ...

docket:	a0893-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24131

5 GARY S. DEMARZO v. THE CITY OF WILDWOOD -- rank: 912

... his report, must demonstrate compliance with the exhaustion requirement in N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. Lippman , supra , slip op. at 47. N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 makes clear that "[t]he protection against retaliatory action provided ... alleged adverse employment action and the failure to comply with N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. Plaintiff does not claim defendant failed to inform him about ...

docket:	a2882-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53480

6 JOHN GUSLAVAGE v. THE CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 853

... of proof with respect to the reporting requirement contained in N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. When reviewing a ruling by a trial judge on a ... law, or a rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to law[.]" N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 (emphasis added).] At the close of plaintiff's proofs, defendant ... on appeal that the "reasonable certainty" standard set forth in N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 necessarily "presents a higher hurdle than the 'reasonable belief' standard ... s activities in order to satisfy the reporting requirement in N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. In defendant's view, Coutis's statement to plaintiff that ...

docket:	a2408-06
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-12-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	138597

7 TERRY HESTER v. PATRICIA PARKER -- rank: 839

... the employer a reasonable opportunity to correct the illegal practice. N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law ...

docket:	a1681-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-04-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	39250

8 RICHARD GACINA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 749

... disclosure provided, however, that the situation is emergency in nature. [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-4.] As an initial matter, plaintiff offers no argument to demonstrate ...

docket:	a6233-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	59122

9 BARRATT V. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC. -- rank: 742

... a partnership liable for the wrongs of individual partners. See N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, does not undermine Barratt's action. The purpose of that ... or unethical activities. We doubt that the Legislature intended that N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 would bar a retaliatory discharge action under the 1989 amendments ...

docket:	a-128-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-05-12
status:
citation:	144 N.J. 120
Document Size:	35386

10 MICHAEL WOLFF v. SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY -- rank: 738

... filed reports claiming this too was retaliation in violation of N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 of CEPA, which he called the "Whistleblower Protection Act." The ...

docket:	a0543-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-01-29
status:	published
citation:	439 N.J.Super. 282 108 A.3d 636
Document Size:	61701

11 JOSEPH C. LINNEMAN v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al. -- rank: 707

... a clear mandate of public policy concerning the public . . . welfare. . . . [ N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 requires an employee to have given the employer written notice ...

docket:	a4848-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-03-28
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	27418

12 BRUCE MENTH v. HEARTLAND OSTRICH FARM -- rank: 686

... abused birds, and notice to the employer, as mandated by N.J.S.A. 34:19-4, the court recognized the factual disputes as sufficient to defeat ...

docket:	a4522-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21356

13 ALESSANDRA VIOLA v. COUNTY OF BERGEN -- rank: 662

... FOR FILING A CEPA SUIT AGAINST THESE PUBLIC ENTITIES UNDER N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 WAS NOT MET. VII. NEITHER BERGEN COUNTY NOR THE BCPO ...

docket:	a4008-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-12-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27551

14 SAMIRAH MCDANIEL v. ADVANCED PAIN MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS, P.C. -- rank: 498

... to the billing procedures followed by defendants. Defendant relies on N.J.S.A. 34:19-4 to support this proposition. But that provision, which "pertain[s ...

docket:	a6006-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-08-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22119

15 MICHAEL PORTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE -- rank: 449

... a violation of a provision of CEPA is one year. N.J.S.A. 34:19-4. The trial court concluded that under a "strict" interpretation of ...

docket:	a4003-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-10-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44235