Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 THOMAS BEST v. C&M DOOR CONTROLS, INC. -- rank: 1000

... N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -14, specifically N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. Plaintiff cross-appeals challenging the amount of the award. I ... defendant moved for fees pursuant to both the Rule and N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. Plaintiff requested $122,925 in attorneys' fees, $5,493.29 ... award of counsel fees under CEPA's frivolous litigation section, N.J.S.A. 34:19-6, which provides, "[a] court . . . may . . . order that reasonable attorneys' fees ... We concluded that such an award was not justified under N.J.S.A. 34:19-6 despite the no cause verdict because "[t]here was no ... insure employers were not subject to frivolous claims, it enacted N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. In our view, it would be quite anomalous to permit ...

docket:	a3801-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-08-19
status:	published
citation:	402 N.J. Super. 229 953 A.2d 775
Document Size:	93451

2 Joanne Olivieri v. Y.M.F. Carpet, Inc. -- rank: 885

... trial was denied and, pursuant to Section 6 of CEPA, N.J.S.A. 34:19-6, the trial court awarded plaintiff attorneys’ fees and costs in ...

docket:	a-64-05
court:
decided:	2006-05-17
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	80260

3 In the Matter of the Estate of Adrian J. Folcher -- rank: 877

... to prevailing plaintiff in claim under Conscientious Employee Protection Act); N.J.S.A. 34:19-6 (allowing attorney’s fees to defendant under Conscientious Employee Protection ...

docket:	A-3-14
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2016-04-26
status:
citation:	224 N.J. 496 135 A.3d 128
Document Size:	94624

4 Thomas Best v. C&M Door Controls, Inc. -- rank: 845

... without a basis in law or fact,' as required under N.J.S.A 34:19-6. The judge went on to award Best fees under the ... this act was without basis in law or in fact.' N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. In other words, the employer must be vindicated and the ... this act was without basis in law or in fact.' N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. In other words, under CEPA, the employer must be vindicated ...

docket:	a-57-08
court:	supreme
decided:	2009-10-14
status:
citation:	200 N.J. 348 981 A.2d 1267
Document Size:	32992

5 BARRATT V. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC. -- rank: 841

... discrimination claims if "the charge was brought in bad faith," N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. For the defense of the claims under the employment contract ... the CEPA claim, the Appellate Division also ruled that CEPA, N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. Concerning the attorney's fee awarded on the LAD claim ...

docket:	a-128-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-05-12
status:
citation:	144 N.J. 120
Document Size:	35386

6 EDWARD DiMAGGIO v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION -- rank: 770

... fees and costs under the fee-shifting provision of CEPA, N.J.S.A. 34:19-6; the frivolous litigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:15 ... with the type of case we are dealing with here, [ N.J.S.A. ] 34:19-6. And I have reviewed the motion papers and I'm ... reasonable basis in law or equity. . . . . And the other statute, [ N.J.S.A. ] 34:19-6 does indicate that a court may -- underline may -- order that ... failed to properly apply the fee-shifting statute in CEPA, N.J.S.A. 34:19-6, and the frivolous litigation statute, N.J.S.A. 2A ...

docket:	a4810-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24890

7 MICHAEL J. BUCCINNA VS DENISE MICHELETTI & ET ALS -- rank: 679

... Educ. , 138 N.J. 405 , 417 (1994). CEPA provides in N.J.S.A. 34:19-6:             A court, upon notice of motion in accordance with the ...

docket:	a5855-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-04-29
status:	published
citation:	311 N.J.Super. 557
Document Size:	23599

8 PAUL HENNIGAN v. MERCK & CO., INC -- rank: 533

... the frivolous claim provision of the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. 34:19-6, which requires a determination that the action was filed "without ...

docket:	a5866-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-09-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53066

9 BRUCE MENTH v. HEARTLAND OSTRICH FARM -- rank: 505

... counsel fees, asserting plaintiff's action was frivolous, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:19-6. Additionally, defendants moved for the imposition of sanctions against plaintiff ...

docket:	a4522-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21356