Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 34:8-46")   1 to 7 of 7 results. Run time: 0.752 seconds | Search time: 0.745 seconds    
1 AIT GLOBAL INC v. PANKAJ YADAV -- rank: 1000
... the individuals it employs from becoming employed by another person . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h).] Defendant argues this provision means that THSFs that are ... restrictive covenants and liquidated damages provisions in employment contracts. Rather, N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h) merely exempts THSFs from the Act's purview if ... conclusion that can be drawn from a plain reading of N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h) is that, because plaintiff included a restrictive covenant and ...
docket: a2847-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-06-06
status: published
citation: 445 N.J.Super. 513 139 A.3d 129
Document Size: 26941
2 PAYSTAFFING, LLC v. HORS D'OEUVRES UNLIMITED -- rank: 952
... law [ N.J.S.A. 2A:58-10 to -12]. [ N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h)(1)-(3) (internal quotation marks omitted).] Defendants filed a ... October 12, 2012. Defendants also argued that no exemption under N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h) applied. Plaintiffs conceded that Paystaffing was not registered as ... argued that Paystaffing was exempt from the Act pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h)(1) and (2) because it did not charge its ... Relying on Data Informatics , supra , Judge Harz held that the N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h)(1) and (2) exemptions did not apply because: (1 ... failed to register. Id. at 78. We determined that the N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h)(1) and (2) exemptions did not apply because the ...
docket: a1020-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-01-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27435
3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/bordino.opn.html -- rank: 924
... the individuals it employs from becoming employed by another person[.] [ N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h)]. 1 Finally, the PEAA defines a “consulting firmâ ... does not argue that it falls within any exemption in N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h). Thus, a possible exemption from the PEAA is not ...
docket: Bordino
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status:
citation:
Document Size: 46744
4 DATA INFORMATICS, INC. v. AmeriSOURCE PARTNERS, et al. -- rank: 864
... seq. and N.J.S.A. 56:8-1.1.")]      N.J.S.A. 34:8-46 provides, in pertinent part, that the provisions of the Act ...
docket: a4364-99
court: njappellate
decided: 2001-03-14
status: published
citation: 338 N.J.Super. 61
Document Size: 47435
5 SPACEAGE CONSULTING CORP v. DARIO MONTECASTRO -- rank: 860
... 2005, plaintiff obtained registration as an exempt THSF pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h) based on a representation in the application that plaintiff ... individuals it employs from becoming employed by any other person." N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h)(1)-(2); see also N.J.A.C. 13 ...
docket: a4936-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-05-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 38498
6 SPACEAGE CONSULTING CORP v. DARIO MONTECASTRO -- rank: 860
... 2005, plaintiff obtained registration as an exempt THSF pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h) based on a representation in the application that plaintiff ... individuals it employs from becoming employed by any other person." N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h)(1)-(2); see also N.J.A.C. 13 ...
docket: a5390-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-05-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 38500
7 VSG ACQUISITION CORP v. SM & SP, INC -- rank: 840
... replacing individuals who are striking or who are locked out . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 34:8-46(h).] It was undisputed that VSG did not collect fees ...
docket: a6208-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-07-09
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 25972

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!