Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRYANT I. THOMPSON -- rank: 1000

... 66.3)' for '2 stop lamps' in the first sentence.' N.J.S.A. 39:3-66.3 is a new statute, effective the same date, which is ...

docket:	a5318-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-06-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29774

2 State v. Ryan Sutherland -- rank: 979

... as prescribed by section 2 of L. 2013, c. 230 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:3-66.3), two turn signals, and two reflectors, one of each at ...

docket:	a_14_16
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2018-01-11
status:
citation:
Document Size:	54988

3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0855-20.opn.html -- rank: 883

... tail lamps, two or more stop lamps, as prescribed by [N.J.S.A. 39:3-66.3], two turn signals, and two reflectors, one of each at ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	17216

4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JENNIFER R. WIGGINS -- rank: 682

... had a reasonable and articulable suspicion of a violation of N.J.S.A. 39:3-66.3, even though the Legislature did not require center brake lights ... called a "cyclops brake light," the light is defined under N.J.S.A. 39:3-66.3 as a "high-mounted rear stoplight on the vertical centerline ...

docket:	a1487-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	76764

5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTONIA MCLEOD -- rank: 588

... moving or equipment violation). Defendant contends that the relevant statute, N.J.S.A. 39:3-66.3, only requires that two brake lights be functioning. He thus ... law. The plain language of the statute governing brake lights, N.J.S.A. 39:3-66.3, clearly refutes defendant's contention that two working brake lights ... police thus had reasonable suspicion to believe a violation of N.J.S.A. 39:3-66.3 was occurring, the motor vehicle stop and ensuing DUI investigation ...

docket:	a4790-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-04-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11074