Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:4-126")   1 to 15 of 53 results. Run time: 0.829 seconds | Search time: 0.822 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 Next 15
1 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DYLAN D. BARAZANJI -- rank: 1000
... briefs on the 100-foot turn signaling rule imposed by N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 and oral argument, on February 25, 2020, the court issued ... proof to uphold the warrantless search and the requirements of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, the statute relied upon by Williams for the traffic stop ... The court found Williams 'had a reasonable and articulable suspicion' N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 was violated. The court reasoned that because [Officer] Williams' conclusion ... over because any lane change without a sufficient signal violates [ N.J.S.A. 39:4- 126].' Defendant contends that Williams was mistaken as to the law ... motor vehicle stop was based on a perceived violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, which provides: No person shall . . . turn a vehicle from a ... the vehicle before turning. The 'clear and unambiguous language' of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 does 'not project a requirement that a turn movement ...
docket: a0240-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-04-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35358
2 State v. Reynold Regis -- rank: 916
... vehicle and the traffic upon, and condition of, the highway”); N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 (prohibiting turning a vehicle without an appropriate signal “in ...
docket: A-81-10
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2011-12-14
status:
citation:
Document Size: 65769
3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2271-18.opn.html -- rank: 897
... slight right turn onto the 295-North ramp without signaling, N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. At the time, defendant was not speeding, nor did he ... adequately address the issue of whether defendant's violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 'may' have affected traffic. Therefore, and over defense counsel's ... contends that we should reject the judge's interpretation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 'because it would lead to the unintended result that [every ... event any other traffic may be affected by such movement. [N.J.S.A. 39:4-126.] This court recognized in State v. Moss that an officer may rely on N.J.S.A. 39:4- 126 to make a lawful motor vehicle stop even if the ... matter of law.' Ibid. The plain and unambiguous language of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 does 'not project a requirement that a turn movement ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 21573
4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAYMOND N. BOBEA -- rank: 890
... J.S.A. 38:4-88(b), as charged, and N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, which neither was charged nor advanced by the State, or ... S.A. 39:4-88(b) in pari materia with N.J.S.A. 39:4-126,3 and wrongly concluded that even if a motor vehicle ... Constitutions.' State v. Dunbar, 229 N.J. 521, 532 3 N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 states, in relevant part: No person shall turn a vehicle ... together N.J.S.A. 39:4-88(b) and N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 to justify the stop, that decision was erroneous. '[A] court ...
docket: a2031-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-04-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 35028
5 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3313-14.opn.html -- rank: 854
... any other traffic may be affected by such movement." See N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. The court also instructed the jury to take into account ... hand turn charge is also appropriate for issues arising under N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, which specifically addresses turns or movements that do not occur ... with safety," is nearly identical to the language used in N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. We are satisfied the left-hand turn charge was appropriate ... care to defendant approaching from behind. This argument ignores both N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 and McGowan v. Barry , 210 N.J. Super. 469 , 473 ... regarding N.J.S.A. 39:4-14.2 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 also constituted reversible error. N.J.S.A. 39:4 ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 24378
6 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANNE SHEARMAN -- rank: 843
... 4-82, and failing to use a signal to turn, N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. 4 II. In reviewing a trial court's decision on ... to signal and failing to keep right. A person violates N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 when "any other traffic may be affected" by an unsignaled ...
docket: a1780-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-12-21
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 55083
7 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. SHAEDDENZEL Y. COLEMAN -- rank: 810
... Pitcher, 379 N.J. Super. 308, 318 (App. Div. 2005). N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 provides: No person shall . . . turn a vehicle from a direct ... may be affected by such movement.' Id. at 303 (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:4-126). The Court focused on the language 'may affect traffic' and ... on defendant's observable failure to signal in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. This conduct by defendant could have reasonably affected traffic. The ... 16 articulable suspicion that a motor-vehicle violation occurred under N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. We thus discern no legal grounds to interfere with the ...
docket: a1110-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-05-08
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 43625
8 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MALCOLM C. HAGANS -- rank: 802
... s observation Chandler failed to signal as she changed lanes, N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, and the taillight was "out." The judge also concluded the ... 47 (App. Div. 1994) (finding reasonable suspicion for violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 existed where defendant made left turn without signaling when other ... a), -66; and (2) the vehicle changed lanes without signaling, N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. The video demonstrates Chandler changed lanes without signaling, in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, and that her taillight assembly was damaged. Defendant argues no ... v. Williamson , supra , 138 N.J. at 303, which states N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 "does not require that a signal be given whenever a ...
docket: a4841-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 39539
9 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRIAN CARTER -- rank: 795
... 29; another summons charging him with failing to properly signal, N.J.S.A. 39:4-126; and a complaint charging defendant with obstructing the administration of ... failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant violated N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. We reverse his conviction and remand the matter for entry ... judgment of acquittal on the summons charging defendant with violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. We remand to the municipal court for a new trial ...
docket: a0853-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-06-27
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44387
10 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES C. MOREY -- rank: 788
... N.J.S.A. 39:4-96, reckless driving, and N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, failure to activate a turn signal, the officer arrested defendant ... had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that defendant violated either N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 or N.J.S.A. 39:4-96, his investigatory stop was valid. N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 says, in pertinent part, "[n]o person shall so turn ... evidence that Officer Ruth believed defendant could be convicted of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 simply by failing to activate his turn signal. Defendant has ... Ruth had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that defendant violated N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, we need not address whether his conduct gave Officer Ruth ...
docket: A3783-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-02-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26722
11 STATE OF NEW JERSEY V. EILEEN PIERCE -- rank: 766
... for the last 100 feet before the turn, contrary to N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, or who parked within fifty feet of a stop sign ...
docket: a-19-93
court: njsupreme
decided: 1994-06-15
status:
citation: 136 N.J. 184
Document Size: 117446
12 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JULIO HEISLER -- rank: 744
... 1. He was acquitted of failing to signal before turning, N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. The court imposed fines and penalties, and suspended defendant's ... violation). In this case, Dapkins suspected that defendant had violated N.J.S.A. 39:4-126, which requires a driver to signal a turn when "traffic ... the driver must signal at least 100 feet before turning. N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. To prove a violation, the State need not show that ...
docket: a6281-08
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-05-17
status: published
citation: 422 N.J. Super. 399 29 A.3d 320
Document Size: 69569
13 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT J. CARROWAY -- rank: 737
... defendant making a left turn without signaling in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. . . . . The court is satisfied that based on the testimony that ... to the officer's reasonable suspicion that the defendant violated [ N.J.S.A. 39:4-126,] justifying the initial stop of the defendant. . . . . The court also ... FAILURE TO SIGNAL WHEN TURNING WAS NOT A VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 BECAUSE NO TRAFFIC WAS AFFECTED BY HIS MOVEMENT. B. O ... v. Mann , 203 N.J. 328 , 338 (2010). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-126: No person shall . . . turn any vehicle without giving an appropriate ...
docket: a1966-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 19705
14 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DION RICHARDSON -- rank: 737
... Nishina, 175 N.J.at 511. The relevant portion of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 reads, '[n]o person shall so turn any vehicle without ... was justified, Heisler and Moss. In those cases, we considered N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 in the context of an investigatory vehicle stop. '[N.J.S.A. 39:4-126] . . . defines the motor-vehicle violation that justifies the stop in ... charged with N.J.S.A. 39:4-50, not N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. Ibid. Because we find no proper justification for the investigatory ...
docket: a4608-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-08-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 19354
15 STATE V. CHARLES H. WILLIAMSON -- rank: 733
... validity of a search following an automobile stopped pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-126. The trooper testified that at about 1:00 p.m ... Supreme Court granted certification. HELD: A traffic stop pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 does not require proof that a defendant's failure to ... s failure to signal may have affected other traffic. 1. N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 does not require that a signal be given whenever a ... of [traffic actually] `affected' other traffic within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:4-126 requires a motorist to signal a lane change "in the ...
docket: a-38-94
court: njsupreme
decided: 1994-12-19
status:
citation: 138 N.J. 302
Document Size: 18497
 Page:1 2 3 4 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!