Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 6384-03T5 GUSTAVO ABAD et al. v. ILENE B. GAGLIARDI et al. -- rank: 1000

... the trial judge should have charged the jury as to N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, concerning crossing at intersections where there is no traffic light ... to N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 rather than N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, and that the verdict was against the weight of the ... shall move, whenever practicable, upon the right half of crosswalks. N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 provides: Where traffic is not controlled and directed either by ... Road was controlled by a traffic light. Further, even if N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 were applicable here, in light of the undisputed facts it ... at a crosswalk due to "the absence of a crosswalk." N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. The crosswalk in this case was clearly visible and readily ...

docket:	a6384-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-06-24
status:	published
citation:	378 N.J. Super. 503
Document Size:	46599

2 BRIAN J. RICE v. CHRISTINA M. MILLER -- rank: 966

... vehicle statutes, N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, bear upon the analysis. N.J.S.A. 39:4 ... side' of N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 is N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, which reads: Where traffic is not controlled and directed either ... any pedestrian to walk along and upon an adjacent roadway. [ N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 (emphasis added).] As the language of these companion statutory provisions ... no nearby traffic signal or any police officer directing traffic, N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 prescribes that the pedestrian, 'in the absence of a crosswalk ... only N.J.S.A. 39:4-33 rather than N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, because the intersection was sufficiently close and the crosswalk 'was ...

docket:	a2513-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-05
status:	published
citation:	455 N.J.Super. 90 187 A.3d 885
Document Size:	82447

3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT FRENCH -- rank: 966

... defendant's conviction for walking with traffic in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 and reverse both convictions for violations of EO 107. I ... to this count as walking with traffic in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. A-3621-21 2 stemming from the April 7, 2020 ... count of violating EO 107, and one count of violating N.J.S.A. 39:4- 34 for failing to cross within a crosswalk. The summons for ... violation of EO 107. The summons charging a violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 is not in the record before us. 4 This charge ... distant manner.' The Law Division also upheld the conviction under N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 for improper walking in the roadway on May 6, 2020 ... a conviction for walking in the direction of traffic under N.J.S.A. 39:4- 34. That statute provides: 'On all highways where there are ...

docket:	a3621-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-12-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43600

4 DIANA ACEVEDO v. CITY OF MILLVILLE -- rank: 929

... any pedestrian to walk along and upon an adjacent roadway,' N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. Indeed, it is clearly dangerous for pedestrians to walk within ... the street's vehicular traffic lanes would be used unlawfully, N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, and dangerously as a pedestrian pathway. The evidence further established ... middle of the street where sidewalks are available is unlawful, N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, and, as recognized by the Court in Polzo, roadways are ...

docket:	a0988-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28370

5 BRANDON CAMACHO v. RIAZ MOTANI -- rank: 876

... Police Department (HTPD), issued a summons to Brandon for jaywalking, N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, that was subsequently dismissed before trial. Plaintiffs then filed the ... concluded his investigation and issued Brandon a summons for violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. 3 He described the "stepping stones" toward formulating his opinion ... after speaking to the prosecutor's office. Although he believed N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 fit the circumstances, after discussing the matter with the prosecutor ... at oral argument that these claims have been abandoned. 3 N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 provides: Where traffic is not controlled and directed either by ...

docket:	a5602-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-09-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	52003

6 VANCE BANKS v. KELLY L. GUNDERSON -- rank: 794

... night, with his back to traffic. That was contrary to N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, which provides that '[o]n all highways where there are ...

docket:	a0569-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-05-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	130811

7 FRANK LAWYER v. MARY G. GASTRICH -- rank: 761

... pedestrians in N.J.S.A. 39:4-36 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. Later in the deliberations, the jury sent out another note ... any pedestrian to walk along and upon an adjacent roadway." N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. Although the court also informed the jury that Gastrich had ...

docket:	a1159-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	52289

8 PATRICIA SHILINSKY v. BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD -- rank: 671

... control signal, pedestrians shall cross the roadway within a crosswalk[.]" N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. "[T]hese two sections are aimed at preventing the conduct ...

docket:	a0028-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-03-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44405

9 BARBARA STEMPLE v. THOMAS W. BORES, et al. -- rank: 671

... only statutes it would refer to in its charge were N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-36, which the ...

docket:	a3623-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-07-19
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	73916

10 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STANLEY CLAIBORNE -- rank: 649

... court found this behavior created a reasonable suspicion defendant violated N.J.S.A. 39:4-34.5 Based upon these facts, which are adequately supported in ... side of the roadway or its shoulder facing approaching traffic. [N.J.S.A. 39:4-34.] A-3277-20 15 need not address defendant's arguments ...

docket:	a3277-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-17
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33747

11 BONG H. LEE v. ANTHONY J. GILBERTI SR. -- rank: 611

... or the fact that plaintiff's conduct violated State law. N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 states explicitly that "[i]t shall be unlawful for a ...

docket:	a0418-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	62565

12 JOSEPH MOORE v. CROATIAN AMERICAN BOCCI CLUB, INC. -- rank: 522

... a pedestrian must use a sidewalk when one is present. N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. However, when no sidewalk is present the pedestrian must "when ...

docket:	a5185-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-27
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	44259

13 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. -- rank: 522

... The officers stopped to issue summonses for a violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-34, which makes it unlawful for a pedestrian to walk along ... —— the three pedestrians were blocking the roadway. See N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. Knowing there had been a surge in shootings in the ...

docket:	a1048-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17273

14 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VICTOR MONDELLI -- rank: 451

... of Berkeley Heights and convicted of jaywalking in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-34. He was ordered to pay a twenty-one dollar fine ... to support the conviction. We reject this argument and affirm. N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 provides, in pertinent part, that "[w]here traffic is not ...

docket:	a6061-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-07
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	21213

15 YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO. -- rank: 410

... Legislature has enacted laws prohibiting the crossing of divided roads. N.J.S.A. 39:4-34 provides in part: "It shall be unlawful for a pedestrian ...

docket:	a-30-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-01-18
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 162
Document Size:	32171