Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:4-8")   1 to 14 of 14 results. Run time: 0.960 seconds | Search time: 0.953 seconds    
1 IN RE LEONIA BOROUGH ORDINANCE NUMBERS 2018-15, 2018-14, AND 2018-17 -- rank: 1000
... THE STATE CONSTITUTION AND VIOLATES THE EXPRESS LEGISLATIVE POLICY IN N.J.S.A. 39:4- 8 CONFERRING AUTHORITY ON THE 1 Attorney General Formal Opinion 1955 ... TIMES SINCE THE 1955 ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION. [POINT THREE] N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 PROVIDES THAT TRAFFIC REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES ARE ... provision to allow municipalities to adopt ordinances 'otherwise provided in' N.J.S.A. 39:4-8. N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(a) provides in part: Except as otherwise provided in this ... is warranted. A-2095-18T4 9 The plain language of N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(a) contemplates that municipalities may pass measures—including ordinances—governing ... traffic ordinances would be passed and submitted to the Commissioner. N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(a). A-2095-18T4 10 Of course, per N. ...
docket: a2095-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-03-06
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31674
2 6-8 HOFFMAN PLACE, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON -- rank: 962
... that the allegation stated a legal conclusion. The version of N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 on which Irvington relies defines 'self-contained streets.' See infra ... to the Property.' In a written opinion, the judge, citing N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(a), found that 'procedural deficiencies . . . render[ed] ordinances unenforceable as ... DOT approval; and in relying on an amended version of N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 that was not in place when Irvington adopted the ordinances ... Super. at 633. Irvington does not dispute the applicability of N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 to this case and the ordinances at issue. It asserts ... correctly notes that the judge applied the current version of N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 instead of the version in place when Irvington adopted the ... conclusion that the ordinances are unenforceable. Although the version of N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 in place when Irvington adopted the ordinances did not ...
docket: a2141-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-03-05
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28794
3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT BARRETT -- rank: 922
... signal monitoring systems, commonly known as red light cameras. See N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.12 to -8.20. Under N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.14(a), "[a] municipality desiring to participate in the program ... the amber light shall be increased by one-half second[.] [ N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.14(a)(3).] Thus, a red light camera cannot be ... camera without first applying and including the certification required under N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.14(a)(3). The court "could therefore properly determine that ... the traffic control device was not placed in accordance with N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.14(a)(3), or inspected and certified every six months as required by N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.14(e). Even if this weak evidence was sufficient ...
docket: a5467-12
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-07-16
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 31030
4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RYAN MELSKY -- rank: 918
... Nissan, for failure to observe a traffic signal, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.15 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-81. The ... J.S.A. 39:4-81, which is processed under N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.15's traffic control monitoring system, is analogous to a ... imprisonment, points, and license suspension. Yet, a violation produced by N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.15 entails only a fine, and yields no possibility of ... of the vehicle that failed to observe the red light. N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.15(b) provides that the owner and operator [of a ... at an unmarked crosswalk, into which the driver is turning. N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.15 reads, in part, as follows: b. Except as provided ... of a vehicle are "jointly liable" for traffic violations under N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.15, the statute clearly provides that the owner can ...
docket: a0193-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-04-16
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 43362
5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PAUL MARINACCIO -- rank: 872
... Twp. Comm. of Manalapan, 140 N.J. 366, 378 (1995). N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(c) authorizes a municipality to regulate parking by ordinance, stating ... municipal ordinance prohibiting on-street overnight parking is valid under N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(c) because the statute permits a municipality to 'prohibit general ... 199 N.J. Super. 201, 207 (App. Div. 1985) (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(c)(1) and (3)). Enactment of a parking ordinance alone ...
docket: a0271-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-02-23
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32720
6 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARTIN F. SMITH -- rank: 772
... the County of Morris or Township of Parsippany complied with N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(b) in the absence of proof that the Commissioner of ... to present any evidence of authorization for the sign. See N.J.S.A. 39:4-8. 5 See also N.J.S.A. 39:4-183 ... maintained by the State. To the extent that compliance with N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 is necessary to establish in some other prosecution that a ...
docket: a5217-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-07-30
status: published
citation: 408 N.J. Super. 484 975 A.2d 523
Document Size: 40917
7 State v. Kevin -- rank: 753
... is invalid because it was not passed in conformity with N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(b); (4) the absence of notice and irregularities in the ... the Borough's ordinance was not passed in conformity with N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(b). That statute provides, in relevant part, that "no ordinance ... same is approved by the [New Jersey Commissioner of Transportation.]" N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(a). By its express language, that statutory provision only applies ... conditions[;]" the statute does not apply to parking ordinances. Thus, N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(b) states: A municipality may, without the approval of the ...
docket: a3033-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-03-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 24059
8 JOSEPH A. GARDI v. NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION -- rank: 663
... i o l a t i v e o f N . J . S . A . 39: 4 - 8 1 ; a p p e l l a nt w ...
docket: a6011-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-02-04
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 274132
9 BRYCE PATRICK v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 591
... be, so determine they are necessary.") (emphasis added); See also N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.10(b) ([A] municipality . . . may . . . construct traffic calming measures where ...
docket: a2792-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-04-24
status: published
citation: 449 N.J.Super. 565 159 A.3d 906
Document Size: 39498
10 IN RE BOROUGH OF LEONIA ORDINANCE NUMBERS 2018-14, 2018-15, and 2018-17 -- rank: 573
... OF TRAFFIC ON THE PUBLIC HIGHWAYS. POINT III CONTRARY TO N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(A), THE COMMISSIONER CONSIDERED FACTS BEYOND WHAT WAS SUBMITTED BY ... s traffic count data did not support the ordinances. See N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(a). While acknowledging Leonia's undisputed authority to enact traffic ... reasons for the municipal engineer's decision as required by N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(a).' The Commissioner also noted that New Jersey has a ...
docket: a0777-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-04-29
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 9846
11 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ABRAHAM M. ABRAMSON -- rank: 542
... jeopardy bars the State's appeal. Affirmed. 1 Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-8.14(a)(3), a municipality desiring to participate in the ...
docket: a0363-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 0000-00-00
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23498
12 ALMA MILEY v. ANDREW M. FRIEL -- rank: 495
... the Commissioner of Transportation A-3388-18T1 3 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 and N.J.S.A. 39:4-202, rendering the ...
docket: a3388-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-01-09
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16271
13 ALL NATIONS TAXI v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK -- rank: 408
... to Count Four of the complaint, Judge Longhi held that N.J.S.A. 39:4-8 does not preempt the parking, stopping and standing regulations contained ...
docket: a5362-05
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-07-17
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 51981
14 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ELLEN HEINE -- rank: 367
... rights." Municipalities are authorized to "prohibit or restrict general parking." N.J.S.A. 39:4-8(c)(1). Municipal ordinances are presumed to be both valid ...
docket: a2804-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-12-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 24282

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!