Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:4-86")   1 to 10 of 10 results. Run time: 0.923 seconds | Search time: 0.916 seconds    
1 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT J. FIELDS, JR -- rank: 1000
... him guilty of crossing no-passing lanes, in violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. We affirm. The following facts are taken from the record ... stopped defendant, and issued him a summons for violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. A trial ensued in the municipal court. Patrolman Endres testified ... evidence of the incident. Defendant was adjudicated guilty of violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-86 and required to pay a fine of $60 and $33 ... an obstruction. Therefore, he could not be found guilty of N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. After a de novo review of the record, the Law Division judge found defendant guilty. The judge noted N.J.S.A. 39:4-86 requires the road must be both obstructed and impassable. The ... argues the trial court abused its discretion because it misconstrued N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. He asserts the statute does not require the road ...
docket: a2757-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-11-02
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 28947
2 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5261-14.opn.html -- rank: 954
... side is clearly visible and free of oncoming traffic." See N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. Defense counsel did not object to the first charge, 2 ... northbound lane in order to pass defendant on the left, N.J.S.A. 39:4-86 was inapplicable. The judge denied both requests. As to N ... the judge determined the statute was not "applicable." As to N.J.S.A. 39:4-86, the judge concluded it was unsupported by the facts. Plaintiff ... a driver may only legally pass on the left. Regarding N.J.S.A. 39:4-86, plaintiff contends the jury needed to understand he could lawfully ... statute did not apply to the facts of this case. N.J.S.A. 39:4-86 prohibits crossing to the left side of a center line ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 30758
3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARC LIEBESKIND -- rank: 905
... driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-97; improper passing, N.J.S.A. 39:4-86; failure to have headlights on, N.J.S.A. 39 ...
docket: a0644-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-12-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 61903
4 FRANKIE CRUZ v. ROY C. TROTTA et al. -- rank: 788
... except when the driver's lane is "obstructed and impassable." N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. More specifically, the question is whether the evidence justified submitting ... II     We consider first the statute governing no-passing lines, N.J.S.A. 39:4-86, which provides in pertinent part as follows:      Except when otherwise ... not constitute obstructions, the Court's comments apply equally to N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. While this case may be close, we cannot say as ...
docket: A0381-02
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2003-10-20
status: published
citation: 363 N.J. Super. 353 833 A.2d 72
Document Size: 25589
5 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BLAIR CREED -- rank: 784
... A. 39:4-50; crossing over a double yellow line, N.J.S.A. 39:4-86; careless driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-97; and ...
docket: a3496-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-11-20
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20801
6 State of New Jersey v. John R. Cummings -- rank: 732
... cases. Footnote: 2     Defendant also entered guilty pleas to violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-86 (crossing “no passing” double yellow lines) and to an amended ...
docket: a-65-04
court: njsupreme
decided: 2005-06-23
status:
citation: 184 N.J. 84
Document Size: 50692
7 EDWARD IARRAPINO v. PATRICIA DALLI -- rank: 603
... Onofrio to testify as to the meaning and intent of N.J.S.A. 39:4-86. The statute provides in pertinent part that, in certain circumstances ...
docket: a3223-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-03-11
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 63312
8 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT B. CAMPBELL -- rank: 486
... or anyone else issue Mr. Campbell a ticket for violating N.J.S.A. 39:4-86 (crossing a "no passing" line). Further, there was no testimony ...
docket: a4299-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-11-01
status: unpublished
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 36517
9 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JACQUELINE M. CRISTOSI -- rank: 464
... guilty to additional charges of crossing the double yellow line, N.J.S.A. 39:4-86, and reckless driving, N.J.S.A. 39:4-96 ...
docket: A3762-04
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-08-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31009
10 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EMANUEL GOLDMAN -- rank: 441
... passing lines, upon which his careless driving charge was based. N.J.S.A. 39:4-86 provides that a driver shall not cross an appropriately marked ...
docket: a5029-11
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-04-01
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 11551

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!