Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 OMAR SANDERS v. NORMA K. LANGEMEIER -- rank: 1000

... 6-61 to -91. Concomitant with the passage of AICRA, N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 was amended to provide that an uninsured motor vehicle shall ... basic policy is not. Thus, under the plain meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6-62, had there not been liability coverage on the Langemeier vehicle ... to receive payments under the provisions of the" UCJF Law. N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. It therefore follows that because Sanders remains uninsured for medical ... The UCJF argues that the Legislature's failure to amend N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 in 2003, when it created the special policy, to include ... such as Sanders for PIP benefits. It also asserts that N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 expressly provides that a person is not a "qualified person ... Thus, there was no need for the Legislature to amend N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. Because Leslie's vehicle is considered an "uninsured vehicle" ...

docket:	a4335-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-19
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size:	51235

2 BRIAN SARRATT v. NJ PLIGA -- rank: 984

... for failure to establish he was a qualified claimant under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 and to comply with the notice provisions of N.J ... date of the accident rendered him disqualified for benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62, and the eligibility documents he supplied in response to the ... plaintiff failed to establish he was a qualified person under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 because he had not satisfactorily demonstrated that he was without ... because he has established he is a qualified person under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62, and he complied with the notice requirements for recovering benefits ... J. at 189). 'Only claimants who are statutorily qualified under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 may recover benefits under the Fund.' Id. at A-0786 ...

docket:	a0786-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25540

3 Jimenez v. Baglieri -- rank: 908

... owners of automobiles. Only claimants who are statutorily qualified under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 may recover benefits under the Fund. A “qualified person” is ... recourse to uninsured motorist benefits under an applicable insurance policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. Benefits are provided to two classes of individuals, those injured ...

docket:	a-25-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-01-29
status:
citation:	152 N.J. 337
Document Size:	38166

4 Caballero v. Martinez -- rank: 820

... statute to include “a resident of this State.” N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. The UCJF is a remedial statute enacted out of recognition ... she must be “a resident of this State.” N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. The trial court held, and the Appellate Division affirmed, that ... substantially similar character to that provided for by this act. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 (emphasis added).] The UCJF is remedial in nature and acts ...

docket:	a-8-05
court:
decided:	2006-05-18
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	72238

5 VICTOR MANUEL CABALLERO v. RICARDO MARTINEZ, et al. -- rank: 797

... accident, he was not a "qualified person" as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. On appeal, plaintiff contends: POINT I:    THE TRIAL COURT DISREGARDED ... resident of the State" and therefore a "qualified person" under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62, eligible to collect benefits from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment ... Plaintiff meets all other eligibility requirements of the UCJF Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 may maintain his or her domicile elsewhere. Sullivan v. Saylor ... illegal aliens" and "other aliens who are not eligible aliens." N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 embraces all residents, namely those living in New Jersey, who ... therefore pay UCJF surcharges, they cannot be a "qualified person." N.J.S.A. 39:6-62.     Other courts have applied the principle of "dual intent" in ...

docket:	a6276-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-03-10
status:	published
citation:	376 N.J. Super. 175
Document Size:	27680

6 MARTIN V. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND -- rank: 736

... the court concluded that the definition of an "insurer" in N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 was relevant because the conformity statute did not separately define ...

docket:	a-114-94
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1995-07-31
status:
citation:	141 N.J. 279
Document Size:	46930

7 Shaw v. City of Jersey City -- rank: 721

... qualified persons" able to pursue a claim against the UCJF. N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. The Legislature intended this coverage scheme "to give relief to ... a result of the operation of an uninsured motor vehicle . . . ." N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. This provision effectively forecloses insureds possessing uninsured motorist coverage from ...

docket:	a-101-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2002-12-11
status:
citation:	174 N.J. 567
Document Size:	50173

8 Omar Sanders v. Norma K. Langemeier, et al. and New Jersey Property-Liability -- rank: 690

... Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act," P.L. 1972, c. 70 ([ N.J.S.A. 39:6-62, that he was injured in an accident, and that he ...

docket:	a-49-08
court:
decided:	2009-05-04
status:
citation:	199 N.J. 366 972 A.2d 1103
Document Size:	81551

9 ERACLIO CERNA v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM & JUDGMENT BOARD -- rank: 656

... motion was that plaintiff "was not a 'Qualified Person' under N.J.S. A. 39:6-62." Entitlement from UCJF for damages that might otherwise be recovered ... is available only to a "Qualified Person." In this respect, N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 provides in pertinent part: "Qualified person" means a resident of ...

docket:	a4661-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-08-22
status:
citation:
Document Size:	76258

10 MARK S. SHAW v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, et al., on behalf of the UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD -- rank: 637

... a claim, as well as those who are properly covered. N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. It was recognized in Proskurnja , supra , 73 N.J. Super ... of the UCJF. Although the statute creating mandatory UM coverage ( N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. Unlike the claims against the UCJF, claims for which UM ...

docket:	a6669-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-01-03
status:	published
citation:	346 N.J. Super. 219
Document Size:	27412

11 SHADAWN SUMNER V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGEMENT FUND ET AL -- rank: 622

... tortfeasor, only those tort claimants who are statutorily qualified under N.J.S.A. 39:6-62 may recover payment from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund ...

docket:	a1249-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-03-15
status:	published published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	19204

12 TYRELL HARDY, by et al. v. HAMZA ABDUL-MATIN, MERRICK L. HARRIS, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY, and JOSEPH M. KULAK -- rank: 492

... recover under the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Act. See N.J.S.A. 39:6-62, which excludes a person who "is an insured under a ...

docket:	A2153-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-01-02
status:	published
citation:	397 N.J.Super. 574 938 A.2d 938
Document Size:	58681

13 JESUS SANTOS v. JAVIER HERNANDEZ -- rank: 465

... purposes of recovery from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund, N.J.S.A. 39:6-62, or that PLIGA should be estopped from making that argument ...

docket:	a1286-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27600

14 GUARO SOLANO, TANGELA MOORE et al. v. NEW JERSEY PROPERTY-LIABILITY INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION -- rank: 450

... be a "qualified person," as that term is defined in N.J.S.A. 39:6-62. Of relevance here, "no person shall be a qualified person ...

docket:	A1471-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-08-11
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32357